
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Tokenization as Structural Shift: An IMF Note and an Academic Counterpoint
Tokenization is no longer just an efficiency story. It’s becoming a structural shift in financial architecture.
A recent note from the International Monetary Fund, authored by Tobias Adrian, argues that tokenization reshapes settlement, liquidity, and systemic risk through atomic settlement, programmable assets, and embedded compliance.
By contrast, research by Alexandru-Stefan Goghie in Finance and Society suggests that bank-led tokenization platforms may not disintermediate finance at all—but instead allow incumbents to reassert control across private credit, repo, and asset management.
Taken together, these perspectives raise a deeper question:
This is one of the questions I’ll be bringing to Consensus Conference next week.
If you’ll be there May 3–5, feel free to connect. If not, I’d still welcome your perspective.
References
Episode Note
By kathrynj2Tokenization as Structural Shift: An IMF Note and an Academic Counterpoint
Tokenization is no longer just an efficiency story. It’s becoming a structural shift in financial architecture.
A recent note from the International Monetary Fund, authored by Tobias Adrian, argues that tokenization reshapes settlement, liquidity, and systemic risk through atomic settlement, programmable assets, and embedded compliance.
By contrast, research by Alexandru-Stefan Goghie in Finance and Society suggests that bank-led tokenization platforms may not disintermediate finance at all—but instead allow incumbents to reassert control across private credit, repo, and asset management.
Taken together, these perspectives raise a deeper question:
This is one of the questions I’ll be bringing to Consensus Conference next week.
If you’ll be there May 3–5, feel free to connect. If not, I’d still welcome your perspective.
References
Episode Note