Study for the Bar in Your Car

Torts - Negligence Part 5 - Damages


Listen Later

Master the critical final stages of any negligence claim with "Study for the Bar in Your Car"! In Episode 16: Damages and Defenses, your AI hosts, Maude and Claude, drawing from Angela's meticulous notes, unravel how the legal system attempts to rectify harm and what arguments defendants can employ. This episode is crucial for understanding how negligence claims conclude and how financial responsibilities are assigned.

You'll gain a clear understanding of the types of damages recoverable in negligence:

  • Nominal Damages: Symbolic sums (like $1) awarded when a legal wrong is proven but no actual loss demonstrated, vindicating a legal right.
  • Compensatory Damages: Designed to make the injured party "whole" again, covering both economic losses (quantifiable medical bills, lost wages, property repair) and non-economic losses (intangible pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life). Be aware that non-economic damages may face statutory caps in some states.
  • Punitive Damages: Not about compensation, but about punishing egregious, willful, or reckless misconduct and deterring future bad acts. These are not awarded for mere negligence and are subject to strict legal and constitutional limits.
  • Pure Economic Loss Rule: A key concept for the bar, explaining why purely financial losses (like lost profits) without accompanying physical injury or damage to other property are generally not recoverable in tort, falling instead under contract law.

The episode also details the plaintiff's duty to mitigate damages, requiring them to take reasonable steps to minimize their losses after an injury, or their recovery may be reduced.

Then, you'll master the vital defenses to negligence:

  • Contributory Negligence: The historical, harsh rule where any plaintiff fault (even 1%) completely barred recovery. Learn crucial exceptions, like when statutes designed to protect a specific class are violated.
  • Last Clear Chance Doctrine: A common law rule that softened contributory negligence, allowing recovery if the defendant had the final opportunity to avoid the harm but failed.
  • Assumption of Risk: A complete defense if the plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily encountered a specific appreciated risk. This is a subjective test, focusing on the plaintiff's actual knowledge and choice.
  • Comparative Negligence: The modern standard, largely replacing contributory negligence. You'll learn the difference between pure comparative fault (recovery proportional to defendant's fault, no matter plaintiff's percentage) and modified comparative fault (setting a threshold, like 50% or 51%, above which plaintiff recovers nothing). This system compares all types of fault, including strict liability.
  • Joint and Several Liability: Essential for multiple defendants, holding each liable for the entire indivisible injury, though contributions between defendants may apply.

This episode offers crucial insights into both the compensation available and the critical defenses that can make or break a negligence case. Subscribe to the "Study for the Bar in Your Car" podcast today and solidify your torts knowledge!

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Study for the Bar in Your CarBy Angela Rutledge, LLM, LLB