Kasra Dash and James Dooley push back on the idea that disavow files no longer matter, explaining that backlink toxicity still affects trust, rankings, and algorithmic risk thresholds. They outline how damaging links are often acquired passively through scraping, hacked domains, newsjacking, and large-scale aggregator spam, which can quietly inflate a backlink profile’s toxicity and suppress performance over time. Rather than waiting for a full ranking collapse, they emphasise that proactive disavows help protect large and established sites by pruning risks early and preventing partial penalties from escalating. They also stress the importance of using multiple tools when assessing link risk, noting that no single platform provides complete coverage. Kasra Dash and James Dooley argue that Ahrefs, Semrush, and Majestic can each miss links that tools like LRT surface, making combined analysis essential for accurate decisions. By focusing on removing only the most harmful links, rather than over-disavowing, they explain how sites regain “ranking headroom,” allowing new authority signals to take effect more efficiently and restore upward momentum.