In the original name is the original essence.

Conceptually, maat served as a yardstick against which kemetyu measured most of their important experiences with respect to their societal values, relationships with one another and own perception of reality. The essence of maat in human sphere was not a perfect social and economic equality, but rather a harmonious coexistence of societies different levels. The distinction between maat and izfet was determined by practical experience. Behavior that promoted balanced harmonious relationships between people and their environs was right, correct, orderly, just and true. That which did not do so was a manifestation of izfet.