SCOTUS Oral Arguments and Opinions

Trump v. United States | Case No. 23-939 | Date Argued: 04/25/24


Listen Later

The Question Presented is: Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy Presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.

Argued:

For Petitioner: D. John Sauer; For Respondent: Michael R. Dreeben, Counselor to the Special Counsel, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

TIMESTAMPS:

00:00 Introduction

00:05 Petitioner Opening Statement Begins

1:58 Petitioner Free for All Questions Begin

27:18 Petitioner Sequential Questions Begin

57:34 Petitioner Questions End, Respondent Opening Statement Begins

59:27 Respondent Free for All Questions Begin

128:11 Respondent Sequential Questions Begin

2:39:15 Respondent Questions End, Rebuttal (D. John Sauer said he had nothing further)

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

SCOTUS Oral Arguments and OpinionsBy SCOTUS Oral Arguments

  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5

5

3 ratings