
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Question Presented is: Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy Presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.
Argued:
For Petitioner: D. John Sauer; For Respondent: Michael R. Dreeben, Counselor to the Special Counsel, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
TIMESTAMPS:
00:00 Introduction
00:05 Petitioner Opening Statement Begins
1:58 Petitioner Free for All Questions Begin
27:18 Petitioner Sequential Questions Begin
57:34 Petitioner Questions End, Respondent Opening Statement Begins
59:27 Respondent Free for All Questions Begin
128:11 Respondent Sequential Questions Begin
2:39:15 Respondent Questions End, Rebuttal (D. John Sauer said he had nothing further)
By SCOTUS Oral Arguments4.3
66 ratings
The Question Presented is: Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy Presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.
Argued:
For Petitioner: D. John Sauer; For Respondent: Michael R. Dreeben, Counselor to the Special Counsel, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
TIMESTAMPS:
00:00 Introduction
00:05 Petitioner Opening Statement Begins
1:58 Petitioner Free for All Questions Begin
27:18 Petitioner Sequential Questions Begin
57:34 Petitioner Questions End, Respondent Opening Statement Begins
59:27 Respondent Free for All Questions Begin
128:11 Respondent Sequential Questions Begin
2:39:15 Respondent Questions End, Rebuttal (D. John Sauer said he had nothing further)

25,875 Listeners

3,533 Listeners

372 Listeners

695 Listeners

1,118 Listeners

2,888 Listeners

6,296 Listeners

112,617 Listeners

32,371 Listeners

10,240 Listeners

7,071 Listeners

5,776 Listeners

3,882 Listeners

16,081 Listeners

738 Listeners