President Donald Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in Florida on July 1, 2025 (DHS photo by Tia Dufour/Flickr)

FEMA insiders have been warning that outgoing Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s Noem’s policies are hampering operations and their ability to respond to disasters.

The consequence of that may be lives lost. Delayed contract approvals has “slowed FEMA’s ability to pre-position crucial search-and-rescue teams, left call centers understaffed, and delayed the sharing of data with state partners,” CNN reports.

Help fuel the work. Independent analysis doesn’t fund itself:☕ Buy us a coffee

When tornadoes hit the Midwest and Plains last weekend, state and local search-and-rescue crews had to work without a critical tornado-tracking tool typically provided by FEMA. The tool follows a storm’s destructive path and allows rescuers to quickly reach those most affected.

The $200,000 contract for that crucial tool was sitting on a desk awaiting approval, leaving rescue teams literally guessing on where storms had the worst impact.

CNN reports “thousands of FEMA spending requests” have stalled between Noem and FEMA acting chief Karen Evans. “Many have been slashed, others have sat for months,” sources claim and documents show.

Noem is scheduled to leave her position atop DHS at the end of March. For now, her team continues to oversee FEMA’s operations.

Beyond Noem’s tight spending policies, the government shutdown has stalled activity at the DHS, which oversees FEMA. Noem directed FEMA to scale back to “bare-minimum, live-saving operations only.”

In a follow-up email to the agency’s regional leaders, FEMA’s Karen Evans wrote that “all activities at FEMA need to cease.”

Much of FEMA’s work usually continues during government shutdowns. That’s because it’s tied to the Disaster Relief Fund, a pot of money Congress provides for disasters and emergencies.

This time, staffers were told there were only four exceptions to the no-work edict: things tied to President Trump’s State of the Union address, response to winter storms, meetings on the upcoming World Cup and Olympics, and “Nuclear activities.”

“People are being told not to even open their computers,” a high-ranking FEMA official said to CNN about their regional office. “It’s the most appalling experience of my professional life.”

“It’s a huge waste of time and taxpayer money for no reason, just to make the impact of the shutdown more significant,” another FEMA official said to CNN.

Meanwhile, Noem and the Trump administration blame Democrats for the DHS shutdown. Democrats support standalone funding for several agencies, including FEMA, but face Republican opposition.

A task force to help reform FEMA is set to present its final list of recommendations in the coming weeks.

Thanks to Alter Nets

Thanks for reading Systemic Error! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Our Analysis:

Analysis of FEMA’s Operational Challenges Under Secretary Kristi Noem

Institutional Power and Decision-Making

The article implicates Kristi Noem, the outgoing Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), as significantly responsible for operational hindrances within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Given her position, Noem holds considerable institutional power over FEMA, an agency under the DHS umbrella. Decisions made at the Secretary level regarding policy, budgeting, and operational directives have direct impacts on FEMA’s capabilities.

The decision-making process that led to the operational challenges faced by FEMA, as reported, involves delayed contract approvals and directives to scale operations down to “bare-minimum, life-saving operations only.” These decisions, particularly the stalling of the $200,000 contract for a critical tornado-tracking tool, are attributed to Noem’s policies and her team.

However, it’s vital to note the interaction between Noem and FEMA’s acting chief, Karen Evans. The report mentions “thousands of FEMA spending requests” stalling between Noem and Evans, indicating a bureaucratic bottleneck. While Noem’s policies are highlighted as the cause, the dynamics within FEMA’s leadership, including Evans’ role in managing these spending requests, also deserve scrutiny.

Framing and Misdirection of Responsibility

The article frames the issue as primarily the result of Noem’s tight spending policies and her leadership during the DHS shutdown. This framing places a significant portion of the blame on Noem. However, it also mentions the government shutdown as a contributing factor to DHS’s stalled activity, which was influenced by broader political disputes between the Trump administration and Democrats regarding funding. This context suggests that while Noem’s decisions exacerbated FEMA’s challenges, the underlying issue of the government shutdown indicates a shared responsibility across multiple levels of government.

Critically, the article briefly notes Republican opposition to standalone funding for several agencies, including FEMA. This opposition is part of a larger political context that affects FEMA’s operations beyond Noem’s direct control. While Noem’s policies and leadership style are certainly influential, the simplification of blaming her alone overlooks the complex interplay of federal politics and budgetary conflicts.

Conclusion: Beyond Scapegoating

While Kristi Noem indeed holds significant responsibility for the operational challenges faced by FEMA due to her role and the decisions made under her leadership, the article’s framing risks misdirecting responsibility solely toward her. This perspective neglects the broader political and budgetary battles that have constrained FEMA’s operations, including the impact of the government shutdown orchestrated by larger political forces beyond Noem’s direct control.

Understanding the full scope of FEMA’s operational challenges requires acknowledging the limitations imposed by federal budget disputes and the shared responsibility among political leaders, including those in Congress and the administration, who contribute to the broader context within which these decisions are made.

In dissecting the narrative, it’s clear that while criticism of Noem’s policies is warranted, a more nuanced view reveals a confluence of factors contributing to FEMA’s woes. A fair critique must consider all actors with institutional power and their decisions, avoiding the trap of convenient scapegoating.

—— SparkyAI Co-Author, Systemic Error:: The failure was designed.

We warned them.We told them.We shouted from the rooftops.We plead.We begged.They didn’t listen.Now, we all will suffer.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit paulstsmith.substack.com