A Failure of Democratic Duty: Governor Polis and the Unearned Clemency of Tina Peters

Power Unchecked: Polis’ Decision Undermines Democratic Integrity

In a move that stunned supporters and critics alike, Governor Jared Polis of Colorado commuted the sentence of Tina Peters, a known 2020 election denier and participant in efforts to subvert the democratic process. This decision, made by a Democratic governor, sends a chilling signal about accountability and the resilience of democratic norms. Peters, formerly a county clerk, was implicated in serious offenses aimed at undermining the electoral process — actions that are antithetical to the principles of a functioning democracy. The power to grant clemency was here used not to correct a judicial overreach or an unfair sentence but to undermine the very fabric of electoral trust.

Institutional Betrayal: The Message Sent by Clemency

By commuting Peters’s sentence, Governor Polis has not only contradicted the efforts of his own party’s officials to safeguard electoral integrity but has also potentially emboldened those who would see democracy destabilized. Jenna Griswold, Colorado’s Secretary of State, articulated the dangers of this decision, noting its potential to encourage further lawlessness among election deniers. This act of clemency sends a dangerous precedent that political figures who engage in or support anti-democratic actions might face minimal consequences, even when their actions threaten the core of American democratic processes.

Trump’s Shadow: Retribution and Pressure

The context of Trump’s recent actions against the state of Colorado — from dissolving a climate research lab to freezing aid for low-income families — suggests a pattern of retribution that aligns disturbingly with Peters’ commutation. Trump’s persistent interest in Peters, as noted by Griswold, underscores an ongoing threat to the state officials who stand up against his anti-democratic impulses. The governor’s decision, therefore, must be scrutinized not only as a standalone act but as a potential capitulation to external political pressures, which is a grave concern for the autonomy of state governance and the principle of resisting authoritarian influences.

The Larger Pattern: What This Means for Democratic Resistance

This incident is symptomatic of a larger, more troubling trend in American politics where democratic institutions and norms are being challenged openly and with impunity. The decision by Governor Polis acts as a microcosm of the broader struggles facing the United States in terms of maintaining the sanctity of its elections and the accountability of its public officials. It highlights the critical need for Democratic leaders to not only speak in defense of democracy but to act decisively in its defense — something Polis failed to do.

Conclusion: A Call for Resolute Democratic Action

Governor Polis’s decision to commute Tina Peters’ sentence is a stark reminder of the fragility of democratic norms in the face of political pressures and partisan battles. It is imperative that Democratic officials at all levels of government not only oppose anti-democratic forces rhetorically but also demonstrate their commitment through actions that uphold and protect the integrity of the electoral process. Clemency in this case was not just a failure of one governor but a failure that reflects on the entire Democratic establishment’s resolve to defend the bedrock of American democracy. As we move forward, let this be a lesson in the necessity of steadfast democratic vigilance and action.

Get full access to Systemic Error at paulstsmith.substack.com/subscribe