In today's episode of Truth Wanted, Jon the Skeptick and Lil, The Beard of Empathy, tackle UFO footage, ancient alien theories, and biblical prophecies!

Georgi in Bulgaria shares UFO footage from his YouTube channel, convinced he's captured something extraordinary. The hosts explain that without perspective, distance, or size reference, any object in the sky is just unidentified. Why does unidentified automatically mean aliens? What evidence bridges the gap between "I don't know what that is" and "therefore extraterrestrials"? Georgi's leap from mystery to conclusion skips the most important step: demonstration.

Nick in IL argues that mythological stories reflect actual human encounters with advanced technology, not gods. If ancient people saw advanced tech, how do we distinguish that claim from pure speculation? What method separates your interpretation from fan fiction? The hosts press Nick on the difference between an interesting idea and demonstrable truth. Why should we accept your reading of myths over the simpler explanation that people made up stories?

John in CA defends biblical prophecies and miracles as proof of divine truth. The hosts challenge translation issues, noting "virgin" versus "young woman" in Isaiah, and ask why miracles conveniently stopped when recording technology arrived. Why are there two contradictory creation accounts in Genesis? If the Bible is inerrant, why does it contradict itself on page one? John's confidence in prophecy crumbles under scrutiny of the text itself.

Thank you for joining us this week! We will see you next time!

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today's episode of Truth Wanted, ObjectivelyDan and Jay tackle tarot cards, psychic scams, and the emotional toll of pseudoscience on relationships!

Ben in Canada proposes that tarot cards work through emotions rather than scientific knowledge, suggesting our thoughts might be illusions created to process emotions. How do tarot cards differ from other self-reflection tools like journaling? If tarot isn't predicting the future, what exactly is it doing? When we use cards to explore our feelings, are we discovering truth or just confirming what we already believe?

Justin in NJ shares a devastating discovery: his wife spent over $8,000 on psychic readings after her cancer diagnosis, including claims she could communicate with his deceased father. How do you rebuild trust when your partner hides major financial decisions? What happens when grief makes someone vulnerable to exploitation? Can a relationship survive when one partner's coping mechanisms directly contradict the other's worldview?

Thank you for tuning in this week! We will see you next time!

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today's episode of Truth Wanted, ObjectivelyDan, Kelley Laughlin, and Secular Rarity tackle prophetic dreams, cosmic consciousness claims, and the ethics of placenta consumption!

Jacob in ID shares his past experiences with seemingly prophetic dreams that appeared to predict future events. After reflection, he realizes these predictions were likely just people being predictable rather than supernatural ability. How often do we mistake pattern recognition for prophecy? When we look back at our "predictions," are we remembering the hits and forgetting the misses?

Georgi in Bulgaria claims humanity designed the universe through exuberance and that Earth is actually the afterlife while spirit is our original state. The hosts struggle to understand his reasoning or find any coherent framework. How do you demonstrate something is true when the explanation itself makes no sense? What does it mean to design something before you exist?

Greg from the live audience in Austin asks the hard-hitting question everyone wants answered: Are human placentas vegan? The show spirals into delightful anarchy as the hosts debate consent, bodily autonomy, and the definition of veganism. Can you consent to someone eating your organs? Where exactly do we draw the ethical line?

Thank you for tuning in this week! We will see you next time!

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today's episode of Truth Wanted, Kelley Laughlin, Felicia, and Stephen Harder examine crystal healing claims, religious evidence, and the vulnerability that drives belief in unproven remedies.

Bob-NY insists that Josephus and Tacitus prove Christ and the Catholic Church are true. What evidence do you have for heaven existing? Why should we accept arbitrary religious rules about salvation? When pressed on quantum physics concepts he invoked, Bob struggles to explain what he actually means. The conversation grows tense as the hosts challenge his claims.

Robin-KY shares how she spent thousands on healing crystals after leaving Christianity. She describes the appeal of crystal properties and her journey through witchcraft beliefs. What made her finally start asking the right questions? Her story shows how magical thinking can follow us even after deconversion.

Anne-CA faced a life-threatening heart condition without health insurance and desperately wished crystal healing would work. When medical care is inaccessible, why do miracle cures become so tempting? She reflects on the vulnerability people feel when they have nowhere else to turn. What harm comes from false hope when real treatment is needed?

Thank you for joining us this week! We will see you next time!

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today's episode of Truth Wanted, ObjectivelyDan, Richard Gilliver, and Kelley Laughlin examine miracles, dreams, and the psychology behind seemingly supernatural experiences.

Jacob in ID calls to express his gratitude for the show, explaining how it serves as his secular community after seven years of listening. Living in a rural area without much access to other atheists, he finds connection through the ACA shows. The hosts thank him for his support and encourage him to keep engaging with the community.

Katie in VA shares her experiences with precognitive and visitation dreams, keeping a detailed dream journal of coincidental events. She describes dreams about deceased people and specific details that later seemed to come true. The hosts discuss Littlewood's Law, which explains how seemingly miraculous coincidences are statistically inevitable given enough opportunities. They explore the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy, where people draw targets around bullet holes after the fact, and how memory can be unreliable. What psychological mechanisms might explain these experiences without invoking the supernatural? The conversation touches on how the Catholic Church evaluates miracles, mass hallucinations like Fatima, and the misinformation effect in eyewitness testimony. How do we distinguish between genuine precognition and pattern-seeking brains finding connections that aren't really there?

Thank you for joining us this week! We will see you next time!

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today's episode of Truth Wanted, ObjectivelyDan, The Beard of Empathy, and Sofia Spina explore deconstruction journeys, recycled god arguments, and the psychology behind psychic belief.

Kelly in OR, a veteran and retiree, shares how finding the term deconstruction gave her a framework for understanding her exit from fundamentalist religion. The hosts discuss processing anger and resentment that often accompany leaving deeply held beliefs. What tools help navigate the emotional aftermath of religious trauma?

Felix in Puerto Rico returns with a dichotomy argument claiming reality's existence proves God. The hosts point out he's reading from the same script as his previous call and challenge his false dichotomy. Why does repeating an argument verbatim not make it more convincing?

Frank in CA insists psychics are real because they exist across cultures and supposedly predicted 9/11. The hosts explain cold reading techniques, confirmation bias, and how widespread belief doesn't establish truth. Why do people remember the hits but forget the countless misses?

Thank you for joining us this week! We will see you next time!

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today's episode of Truth Wanted, Kelley Laughlin and Rion Cultastic tackle epistemology, biblical morality, and the search for evidence!

Adam in NC raises concerns about mythicism and how non-believers can be tricked into false claims. He argues that Jesus likely existed historically despite lacking strong scholarly support for mythicism. How do we separate historical claims from religious ones? What standards of evidence should we apply to ancient figures?

Billy in KY challenges the show's claim about worshiping an evil God. The conversation heats up when hosts point to biblical slavery and the flood as examples. Billy defends religious people and shares his Iranian wife's perspective on Middle East conflicts. Can we separate believers from the beliefs they hold?

Jake in MD, a deist, asks if there's truly no evidence for or against God. Hosts discuss ignosticism and the lack of a universal God definition. Jake argues for God based on cause and effect, but Kelley introduces indefinite causal order research. Does causality require a first cause?

Eugene in WA insists God is all good, not evil. He claims physicists find God through research and that Jesus has more evidence than anything else. Eugene shares a nail gun incident as proof of God's intervention. Do personal experiences count as evidence for everyone?

Thank you for joining us this week! We will see you next time!

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today's episode of Truth Wanted, ObjectivelyDan and Volcy explore deconstruction journeys, evidence-based thinking, and whether nature or cultural impact can justify God claims.

Jon in Canada argues that nature itself is God through a naturalistic pantheist lens, combining Spinoza's philosophy with emergent consciousness. The hosts challenge why the God label is necessary at all. If you're just describing natural phenomena, why add the baggage of a term loaded with supernatural connotations? What does calling nature "God" add to our understanding that simply studying nature doesn't already provide? When you strip away all the traditional attributes of God, what's left that justifies using the word?


Antonio in TX argues that God is real because of religion's massive cultural impact on society. The hosts counter that impactful ideas aren't necessarily true or good. Slavery had cultural impact. Harmful religious influences on policy and rights demonstrate that widespread belief doesn't equal truth. If cultural impact made something real, would that make every influential myth throughout history real? What's the difference between something being culturally significant and something being actually true?

Thank you for joining us this week! We will see you next time!


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today's episode of Truth Wanted, ObjectivelyDan and B-Easy explore cosmological arguments, mysterious lights, and the problem of evil!

Papo in Puerto Rico presents a cosmological argument claiming dependent beings prove God's existence. The hosts challenge his circular reasoning and ask him to demonstrate why the universe must be dependent rather than necessary. Why does one dependent being logically prove God exists? Can you explain the connection without assuming your conclusion?

Georgi in Bulgaria discusses seeing mysterious lights in the sky and believes humans are non-physical eternal beings. He mentions quantum tunneling and claims we're in a physical reality for adventure. What evidence supports these claims beyond personal experience? Why should we accept this explanation over natural phenomena?

George in FL, who studied to be a priest, calls to discuss why the hosts don't believe in God. He claims he's no longer Christian because churches won't baptize animals. The conversation becomes contentious as George repeatedly talks about previous callers instead of engaging with the hosts' explanations. Is anger really the reason for disbelief?

Marie in TX asks about the Shroud of Turin and discusses miracles, cancer remissions, and exorcisms. The hosts explain spontaneous remission as a natural phenomenon and note that supposed demonic languages in exorcisms have been debunked. Would desperation change what we accept as evidence?

Jake in MD identifies as agnostic theist and discusses whether it's more logical to believe everything happened by chance or that there's a guiding force. The hosts discuss the problem of evil and natural processes. Jake acknowledges he was raised Christian and trained to think everything has a reason, admitting fear may play a role.

Thank you for joining us this week! We will see you next time!

00:00 Intro
28:59 Papo-(Puerto Rico) | Dependent Beings Prove God
42:55 Georgi-(Bulgaria) | Mysterious Lights And Non-Physical Beings
51:43 George-FL | Former Priest Student Questions Disbelief
1:08:06 Marie-TX | Shroud Of Turin And Miracles
1:19:30 Jake-MD | Agnostic Theist Explores Chance Versus Design


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.

In today’s episode of Truth Wanted, ObjectivelyDan is joined by Born Again Atheist to explore deconstruction stories and the pitfalls of extreme indoctrination! They dive into the "worship leader side-hustle," the Bill Nye vs. Ken Ham debate, and why learning psychology is the ultimate faith-killer. Can a community built on facts survive the pressure of religious excommunication?Mohammed in India challenges the hosts to prove their own existence before they can criticize belief in God. ObjectivelyDan and Born Again Atheist point out that responding on camera provides more evidence for their existence than any deity has ever offered. If a standard of proof is set too high to be useful, what is the point of the conversation?Sven-WA accuses the hosts of obfuscating the problem of solipsism to make a previous caller look silly. ObjectivelyDan argues that solipsism is a philosophical dead end that doesn't actually provide evidence for any specific deity. Does questioning the existence of other minds actually make ancient miracles more plausible?Jesse-TX claims the complexity of life and mathematical order in the universe prove a creator exists. Born Again Atheist points out that the biblical creation story contradicts the observable order of the natural world, such as trees appearing before sharks. Will future predictions about Middle Eastern wars provide the evidence the Bible lacks?Josh-WA presents the "minimal facts" case for the resurrection, citing the radical transformation of the disciples as proof. The hosts challenge the reliability of hearsay testimony and compare the disciples' sincerity to modern cult followers. Is a 2,000-year-old story enough to bridge the gap between faith and fact?Thank you for joining us today! We will see you next time!

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/truth-wanted--3195473/support.