In this conversation, David Hill and Amy discuss the complexities of judicial reform, emphasizing the importance of understanding the historical context and the principles behind the judiciary. They explore the concept of Chesterton's fence, the significance of an independent judiciary, and the implications of radical reforms. Hill also delves into the judicial selection process in Wyoming, the merit-based system, and the public's perception of judges. The discussion further covers originalism and textualism, the role of the Federalist Society, and the need for informed dialogue about judicial reform.

David's Piece: https://www.powelltribune.com/stories/on-judicial-reform,167814?fbclid=IwY2xjawKkdRRleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFJblBEMHpXZ2hiQmJVVGRxAR6OE1zUpyDLycoq4mg4DOHHz5a1Xya63qbsJyf6M2avg2SZCskdb0tjRjvRXg_aem_qs2IlE2UMUo3Qadvmnb5qA 

More Information on Wyoming's Judicial System: https://www.wyomingbar.org/for-the-public/judicial-branch-faqs/