In this episode of our Take10 podcast, Ian Mann and Gareth Murphy discuss lessons learned from the recent shareholder case of Dinglis.Key takeaways: <ul><li>There was no quasi-partnership;</li><li>There was no unfair prejudice for breach of understandings;</li><li>There was unfair prejudice for breach of fiduciary duties; and</li><li>A minority discount applies as no quasi-partnership existed.</li></ul>

In this episode of our Take10 podcast, Ian Mann and Gareth Murphy discuss lessons learned from the recent shareholder case of Dinglis. Key takeaways: There was no quasi-partnership;There was no unfair prejudice for breach of understandings;There was unfair prejudice for breach of fiduciary duties; andA minority discount applies as no quasi-partnership existed.

In this episode of our Take10 podcast, Ian Mann and Gareth Murphy discuss lessons learned from the recent shareholder case of Dinglis.Key takeaways:&nbsp;<ul><li>There was no quasi-partnership;</li><li>There was no unfair prejudice for breach of understandings;</li><li>There was unfair prejudice for breach of fiduciary duties; and</li><li>A minority discount applies as no quasi-partnership existed.</li></ul>

Unfair prejudice and quasi partnerships - the Dinglis judgment

This series will feature casual 10 minute discussions on the latest litigation cases and market developments relevant to our offshore jurisdictions. Each episode is brought to you by Harneys global offshore law firm.

Share Unfair prejudice and quasi partnerships - the Dinglis judgment

Sign up to save your podcasts

Unfair prejudice and quasi partnerships - the Dinglis judgment

Unfair prejudice and quasi partnerships - the Dinglis judgment