<p>The discussion involves the validity of three concepts associated with Meteorology's Model of Storms: 1) Convectioin 2)Dry Layer Capping and 3) Latent Heat.  The claim here is that these are all story-telling tactics and do no represent valid physics/science.</p>

The discussion involves the validity of three concepts associated with Meteorology's Model of Storms: 1) Convectioin 2)Dry Layer Capping and 3) Latent Heat. The claim here is that these are all story-telling tactics and do no represent valid physics/science.

<p>The discussion involves the validity of three concepts associated with Meteorology's Model of Storms: 1) Convectioin 2)Dry Layer Capping and 3) Latent Heat. &nbsp;The claim here is that these are all story-telling tactics and do no represent valid physics/science.</p>

Untangling Meteorology's Dishonest Rhetoric Regarding Physics of Storms

Exposing the incompetence of the current meteorological paradigm on storm theory and introducing a new, scientifically competent theory of storms and atmospheric flow.

Share Untangling Meteorology's Dishonest Rhetoric Regarding Physics of Storms

Sign up to save your podcasts

Untangling Meteorology's Dishonest Rhetoric Regarding Physics of Storms

Untangling Meteorology's Dishonest Rhetoric Regarding Physics of Storms