What does the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in Chatrie v. United States mean for your digital privacy, law enforcement investigations, and the future of geofence warrants?

In this episode of True Crime with the Sarge: The Audio Files, retired NYPD Sergeant Joseph Giacalone is joined by former Assistant U.S. Attorney and current Adjunct Professor at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School to break down one of the most important Fourth Amendment decisions in the digital age.

Together, they examine the Supreme Court's ruling in Chatrie v. United States, its impact on geofence warrants, the use of Google location history in criminal investigations, and what the decision means for prosecutors, defense attorneys, investigators, and everyday Americans concerned about digital privacy.

Whether you're in law enforcement, the legal profession, a true crime fan, or simply interested in constitutional law, this episode offers an accessible yet in-depth look at a case that will shape criminal investigations for years to come.

In this episode:

• What is Chatrie v. United States?
• Why geofence warrants have become a powerful investigative tool
• How Google location data is used in criminal investigations
• The Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment analysis
• The balance between public safety and digital privacy
• How this decision affects police, prosecutors, and defense attorneys
• The future of electronic surveillance and search warrants

If you enjoy thoughtful discussions on criminal investigations, constitutional law, forensic evidence, and today's biggest true crime stories, be sure to follow True Crime with the Sarge: The Audio Files on Apple Podcasts and leave a rating and review.

Support the show