
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, I walk through a Fabric Pattern that assesses how well a given model does on a task relative to humans. This system uses your smartest AI model to evaluate the performance of other AIs—by scoring them across a range of tasks and comparing them to human intelligence levels.
I talk about:
1. Using One AI to Evaluate Another
The core idea is simple: use your most capable model (like Claude 3 Opus or GPT-4) to judge the outputs of another model (like GPT-3.5 or Haiku) against a task and input. This gives you a way to benchmark quality without manual review.
2. A Human-Centric Grading System
Models are scored on a human scale—from “uneducated” and “high school” up to “PhD” and “world-class human.” Stronger models consistently rate higher, while weaker ones rank lower—just as expected.
3. Custom Prompts That Push for Deeper Evaluation
The rating prompt includes instructions to emulate a 16,000+ dimensional scoring system, using expert-level heuristics and attention to nuance. The system also asks the evaluator to describe what would have been required to score higher, making this a meta-feedback loop for improving future performance.
Note: This episode was recorded a few months ago, so the AI models mentioned may not be the latest—but the framework and methodology still work perfectly with current models.
Subscribe to the newsletter at:
https://danielmiessler.com/subscribe
Join the UL community at:
https://danielmiessler.com/upgrade
Follow on X:
https://x.com/danielmiessler
Follow on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/danielmiessler
See you in the next one!
Become a Member: https://danielmiessler.com/upgrade
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
By Daniel Miessler4.6
134134 ratings
In this episode, I walk through a Fabric Pattern that assesses how well a given model does on a task relative to humans. This system uses your smartest AI model to evaluate the performance of other AIs—by scoring them across a range of tasks and comparing them to human intelligence levels.
I talk about:
1. Using One AI to Evaluate Another
The core idea is simple: use your most capable model (like Claude 3 Opus or GPT-4) to judge the outputs of another model (like GPT-3.5 or Haiku) against a task and input. This gives you a way to benchmark quality without manual review.
2. A Human-Centric Grading System
Models are scored on a human scale—from “uneducated” and “high school” up to “PhD” and “world-class human.” Stronger models consistently rate higher, while weaker ones rank lower—just as expected.
3. Custom Prompts That Push for Deeper Evaluation
The rating prompt includes instructions to emulate a 16,000+ dimensional scoring system, using expert-level heuristics and attention to nuance. The system also asks the evaluator to describe what would have been required to score higher, making this a meta-feedback loop for improving future performance.
Note: This episode was recorded a few months ago, so the AI models mentioned may not be the latest—but the framework and methodology still work perfectly with current models.
Subscribe to the newsletter at:
https://danielmiessler.com/subscribe
Join the UL community at:
https://danielmiessler.com/upgrade
Follow on X:
https://x.com/danielmiessler
Follow on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/danielmiessler
See you in the next one!
Become a Member: https://danielmiessler.com/upgrade
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

2,004 Listeners

371 Listeners

374 Listeners

637 Listeners

1,023 Listeners

322 Listeners

415 Listeners

8,013 Listeners

174 Listeners

314 Listeners

76 Listeners

137 Listeners

45 Listeners

94 Listeners

33 Listeners