Supreme Court scrutinized the authenticity of a motor accident insurance claim involving Vanita and others against Shriram Insurance Company, testing the boundaries of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The case unravelled questions of belated FIRs, disputed eyewitness accounts, and possible collusion—showcasing the controversy that revolves around accident compensation claims. Ultimately, the Court emphasized the strict evidentiary standards required under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act for insurance liability, making this appeal a striking lesson in legal procedure and claim verification. #MotorvehiclesAct #SupremeCourt