Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Walmart+ Evolves to Compete with Major Subscription Services, Streaming Industry Faces Scrutiny over Viewer Privacy and Show Cancellations
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Walmart+ Evolves to Compete with Major Subscription Services, Streaming Industry Faces Scrutiny over Viewer Privacy and Show Cancellations
In the competitive world of retail, Walmart is strengthening its value proposition with the enhancement of its subscription service, Walmart+. Priced at $98 annually or $12.95 monthly, Walmart+ is strategically expanding to include a variety of new benefits and partnerships. This evolution is part of Walmart's broader effort to compete with other major subscription services by offering unique perks that extend beyond free shipping and grocery delivery advantages, thereby aiming to enhance overall customer loyalty and engagement.
In other news, a U.S. report has heavily criticized the television industry, particularly focusing on the prevalent surveillance practices of streaming services. Described as "sinister" by the Center for Digital Democracy (CDD), the report highlights the significant shift in consumer behavior as "connected TV" becomes increasingly dominant. The concern revolves around the extent and nature of data collection and usage, raising privacy implications that could potentially influence regulatory measures in the industry.
Furthermore, the streaming industry is facing scrutiny over its decision-making processes regarding the continuation or cancellation of shows. Recent trends indicate a surge in series being discontinued after just one season. This practice has sparked debate among viewers and industry analysts alike, who are calling for a more transparent and possibly revised approach to how streaming platforms decide the fate of their content. Critics argue that access to viewership metrics and other relevant data should play a crucial role in these decisions, promoting a more audience-driven strategy that might help in reducing abrupt show cancellations.
These developments are unfolding against a backdrop of increasing reliance on streaming services for entertainment, underscored by a recent incident involving a former bookkeeper for a Kalispell firearms business. The individual embezzled funds to cover personal expenses, including payments for streaming services. This case not only highlights the growing ubiquity of such platforms but also casts a light on the broader cultural and economic impacts of the digital shift in media consumption.
In other news, a U.S. report has heavily criticized the television industry, particularly focusing on the prevalent surveillance practices of streaming services. Described as "sinister" by the Center for Digital Democracy (CDD), the report highlights the significant shift in consumer behavior as "connected TV" becomes increasingly dominant. The concern revolves around the extent and nature of data collection and usage, raising privacy implications that could potentially influence regulatory measures in the industry.
Furthermore, the streaming industry is facing scrutiny over its decision-making processes regarding the continuation or cancellation of shows. Recent trends indicate a surge in series being discontinued after just one season. This practice has sparked debate among viewers and industry analysts alike, who are calling for a more transparent and possibly revised approach to how streaming platforms decide the fate of their content. Critics argue that access to viewership metrics and other relevant data should play a crucial role in these decisions, promoting a more audience-driven strategy that might help in reducing abrupt show cancellations.
These developments are unfolding against a backdrop of increasing reliance on streaming services for entertainment, underscored by a recent incident involving a former bookkeeper for a Kalispell firearms business. The individual embezzled funds to cover personal expenses, including payments for streaming services. This case not only highlights the growing ubiquity of such platforms but also casts a light on the broader cultural and economic impacts of the digital shift in media consumption.
View all episodes
By Quiet. PleaseIn the competitive world of retail, Walmart is strengthening its value proposition with the enhancement of its subscription service, Walmart+. Priced at $98 annually or $12.95 monthly, Walmart+ is strategically expanding to include a variety of new benefits and partnerships. This evolution is part of Walmart's broader effort to compete with other major subscription services by offering unique perks that extend beyond free shipping and grocery delivery advantages, thereby aiming to enhance overall customer loyalty and engagement.
In other news, a U.S. report has heavily criticized the television industry, particularly focusing on the prevalent surveillance practices of streaming services. Described as "sinister" by the Center for Digital Democracy (CDD), the report highlights the significant shift in consumer behavior as "connected TV" becomes increasingly dominant. The concern revolves around the extent and nature of data collection and usage, raising privacy implications that could potentially influence regulatory measures in the industry.
Furthermore, the streaming industry is facing scrutiny over its decision-making processes regarding the continuation or cancellation of shows. Recent trends indicate a surge in series being discontinued after just one season. This practice has sparked debate among viewers and industry analysts alike, who are calling for a more transparent and possibly revised approach to how streaming platforms decide the fate of their content. Critics argue that access to viewership metrics and other relevant data should play a crucial role in these decisions, promoting a more audience-driven strategy that might help in reducing abrupt show cancellations.
These developments are unfolding against a backdrop of increasing reliance on streaming services for entertainment, underscored by a recent incident involving a former bookkeeper for a Kalispell firearms business. The individual embezzled funds to cover personal expenses, including payments for streaming services. This case not only highlights the growing ubiquity of such platforms but also casts a light on the broader cultural and economic impacts of the digital shift in media consumption.
In other news, a U.S. report has heavily criticized the television industry, particularly focusing on the prevalent surveillance practices of streaming services. Described as "sinister" by the Center for Digital Democracy (CDD), the report highlights the significant shift in consumer behavior as "connected TV" becomes increasingly dominant. The concern revolves around the extent and nature of data collection and usage, raising privacy implications that could potentially influence regulatory measures in the industry.
Furthermore, the streaming industry is facing scrutiny over its decision-making processes regarding the continuation or cancellation of shows. Recent trends indicate a surge in series being discontinued after just one season. This practice has sparked debate among viewers and industry analysts alike, who are calling for a more transparent and possibly revised approach to how streaming platforms decide the fate of their content. Critics argue that access to viewership metrics and other relevant data should play a crucial role in these decisions, promoting a more audience-driven strategy that might help in reducing abrupt show cancellations.
These developments are unfolding against a backdrop of increasing reliance on streaming services for entertainment, underscored by a recent incident involving a former bookkeeper for a Kalispell firearms business. The individual embezzled funds to cover personal expenses, including payments for streaming services. This case not only highlights the growing ubiquity of such platforms but also casts a light on the broader cultural and economic impacts of the digital shift in media consumption.