
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Millions of people use the service called “Web of Trust”. It’s a crowdsourced process that is supposed to tell you if a website you’re about to click on is trustworthy or malicious, based on the input of the other Web of Trust users. Recently, information has been uncovered about Web of Trust that indicates this service itself is not to be trusted.
I tried Web of Trust a while ago but stopped using it after a short time. However, I know a lot of people do use it.
The theory behind it is good. It’s based on a large group of people, pooling their information. If you visit a website and find that it pops up a fake virus alert, or tries to sneak software on to your computer, you can give it a negative rating in the Web of Trust browser extension database. Presumably, lots of other people are doing the same thing with websites they visit.
So when you do a Google search and you see all the search results listed there waiting for you to click on them, each one of them has the little Web of Trust indicator right next to it, telling you if other users have determined it’s safe to click through, or a site that should be avoided.
As I mentioned, this is a great idea in theory. The problem comes up when there are humans involved, and they get tempted by cash. It appears that this is what has happened with WOT.
Web of Trust claims that their browser extension has been downloaded by over 140 million users:
When a database is that large, it is very attractive to companies that want to target those users with advertising. Web of Trust was clear up front that some information about users was collected, but that it was collected anonymously. That information included geographic location, websites visited, computer operating system, IP address and other details.
But it turns out that linking that data to individual users of the WOT service was very simple to do. This means Web of Trust users could have a lot of private information divulged about them, including:
Not good! Think about how valuable it would be to have that kind of specific information for 140 million people. From what we can tell, WOT could not just keep it to themselves. They sold this information (which could then be connected to specific individuals) to third parties.
When confronted with this, Web of Trust responded with a statement that really didn’t do much. The statement said they are taking the following steps:
That’s fine, but it’s probably too late for that. Trust is earned, and it’s not easy to recover once it’s lost. I recommend that you uninstall the Web of Trust browser extension.
4.8
9696 ratings
Millions of people use the service called “Web of Trust”. It’s a crowdsourced process that is supposed to tell you if a website you’re about to click on is trustworthy or malicious, based on the input of the other Web of Trust users. Recently, information has been uncovered about Web of Trust that indicates this service itself is not to be trusted.
I tried Web of Trust a while ago but stopped using it after a short time. However, I know a lot of people do use it.
The theory behind it is good. It’s based on a large group of people, pooling their information. If you visit a website and find that it pops up a fake virus alert, or tries to sneak software on to your computer, you can give it a negative rating in the Web of Trust browser extension database. Presumably, lots of other people are doing the same thing with websites they visit.
So when you do a Google search and you see all the search results listed there waiting for you to click on them, each one of them has the little Web of Trust indicator right next to it, telling you if other users have determined it’s safe to click through, or a site that should be avoided.
As I mentioned, this is a great idea in theory. The problem comes up when there are humans involved, and they get tempted by cash. It appears that this is what has happened with WOT.
Web of Trust claims that their browser extension has been downloaded by over 140 million users:
When a database is that large, it is very attractive to companies that want to target those users with advertising. Web of Trust was clear up front that some information about users was collected, but that it was collected anonymously. That information included geographic location, websites visited, computer operating system, IP address and other details.
But it turns out that linking that data to individual users of the WOT service was very simple to do. This means Web of Trust users could have a lot of private information divulged about them, including:
Not good! Think about how valuable it would be to have that kind of specific information for 140 million people. From what we can tell, WOT could not just keep it to themselves. They sold this information (which could then be connected to specific individuals) to third parties.
When confronted with this, Web of Trust responded with a statement that really didn’t do much. The statement said they are taking the following steps:
That’s fine, but it’s probably too late for that. Trust is earned, and it’s not easy to recover once it’s lost. I recommend that you uninstall the Web of Trust browser extension.