Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Week of 2025-02-09
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Week of 2025-02-09
Alex: Hello and welcome to The Generative AI Group Digest for the week of 09 Feb 2025!
Maya: We're Alex and Maya.
Alex: First up, we’re talking about the crowded market of B2B voice agents. Stawan pointed out how saturated it is.
Maya: Why is the voice agent space so packed? Are companies offering similar APIs?
Alex: Exactly! Sanyam Jain suggested creating a gateway like Portkey—but specialized for voice APIs—where you can pick the best voice agents for different domains.
Maya: So like a marketplace for voice APIs that simplifies choosing and integrating voice agents?
Alex: Right. Nirant K even chimed in saying that ‘Interfaces’ are the new SaaS. It means how users interact with services—like voice—is the big frontier now.
Maya: Interesting! How does this help startups or businesses?
Alex: It could reduce fragmentation, making it easier to build and scale voice solutions without juggling multiple vendors.
Maya: Next, let’s move on to recent reasoning models and papers that Paras Chopra shared.
Alex: Paras shared annotations on DeepSeek R1 and Kimi K1.5, highlighting insights on what makes them work so well.
Maya: Do these models handle complex reasoning differently?
Alex: Yes. For example, Paras explained how longer chains of thought usually imply tackling harder problems, though the models cleverly find shortcuts to optimize.
Maya: Nirant also tested these models on a business question, finding Kimi gave the most practical answer—less nervous and more PhD-level calm.
Alex: That’s a great example showing how reasoning quality can vary among models. Also, Paras noted training with math data improved performance on general question answering. Math acts as a clean, symbolic language, boosting reasoning.
Maya: So math training can make models better at thinking overall?
Alex: Exactly. Paras also said these models mirror their training data but RL fine-tuning shapes the data they generate themselves—kind of a feedback loop enhancing reasoning.
Maya: Fascinating! What about efficiency in learned representations? Vamshi raised some thoughtful questions there.
Alex: He wondered if models can focus only on the needed parts of their learned knowledge depending on context—like activating just the relevant ‘symbols’ for a math problem versus a rap lyric.
Maya: So models might be over-activating or inefficient currently?
Alex: Possibly. Paras compared this to human thinking—sometimes chaotic and exploratory, which might actually be efficient for solving new problems.
Maya: And adding some randomness can help them converge faster too, as a study shared by SP pointed out.
Alex: Moving on, there’s exciting news about OpenAI’s Deep Research tool. Paras and others shared it’s a big step forward for research workflows.
Maya: How is it different from tools like Gemini Deep Research or Perplexity?
Alex: Deep Research can run long, complex tasks—like analyzing tariffs, stock markets, and simulating investment strategies—using many sources and sustained reasoning.
Maya: That sounds game-changing for analysts and researchers!
Alex: Indeed. Manan shared examples where Deep Research accesses multiple sites and even Amazon to compile detailed reports quickly.
Maya: But some users felt Gemini’s deep research results were average so far. Indexing quality and source choice seem critical.
Alex: Yes, choosing high-quality sources and controlling the research plan are limitations currently.
Maya: Next, on AI models in Indian languages—Paras talked about decoupling knowledge, intelligence, and language during training.
Alex: Right. Instead of mixing it all, focus on training intelligent models first, then do language translation or adaptation separately. That could boost efficiency and quality.
Maya: That’s a neat approach, especially for diverse languages with limited data.
Alex: Rajesh Parikh emphasized that India should focus on real differentiation and solving deep national interests rather than just catching up with global AI trends.
Maya: So building niche, context-aware models that reflect unique biases and knowledge?
Alex: Exactly. Though Paras Chopra cautioned that catching up is necessary to go beyond—getting to table stakes first.
Maya: That’s a healthy debate. Next, listeners wanted to know about practical transcription and audio reasoning tools, especially for noisy multilingual Indian audio.
Alex: Yes, Ishita asked about audio LLMs handling transcription across Indian languages with noise and language switching.
Maya: OpenAI does have a GPT-4 audio preview, but Gemini seemed better for noisy transcription so far.
Alex: Also, people suggested combining transcription engines with LLM reasoning, or trying new tools like Dhwani by Ola.
Maya: So this remains a challenging but active area.
Alex: Moving on, we had lots of discussion about large model training costs and compute.
Maya: Paras estimated $20–50 million to train a DeepSeek R1-style model from scratch, highlighting the huge investment needed.
Alex: Tejas vaidhya and others explained that compute burn is massive, with millions of GPU hours needed for experiments and scaling.
Maya: That’s a significant barrier for many teams.
Alex: But funding and smarter experiments can reduce failed runs.
Maya: And open-source efforts can help spread the knowledge and tools.
Alex: Lastly, some thoughts on AI agents and the future.
Maya: Manan shared OpenAI’s ambition to combine research, chat, voice, coding, remembering, and task execution into digital humans—agents that can do weeks of work in hours.
Alex: He even suggested swarms of hundreds of thousands of such agents working as organizations—an enormous moat for future AI users.
Maya: That’s both exciting and a little intimidating!
Alex: Indeed. And with so many models becoming commodities, scale and orchestration might become the real competitive edge.
Maya: Alright, time for our listener tip!
Here’s a pro tip you can try today inspired by the Deep Research discussions: When using AI-powered research tools, always nudge or steer the model with specific, detailed follow-up questions. That extra prompt can dramatically improve relevance and originality of output.
Alex, how would you use that?
Alex: I’d start broad to gather context, then keep narrowing with targeted questions—kind of like guiding a junior analyst.
Maya: Great approach!
Alex: To wrap up, remember—AI reasoning models are evolving fast, shaped by clever training and real data feedback.
Maya: Don’t forget—the future is likely to belong to whoever builds and manages massive swarms of intelligent agents, not just the smartest single model.
Maya: That’s all for this week’s digest.
Alex: See you next time!
View all episodes
By Alex: Hello and welcome to The Generative AI Group Digest for the week of 09 Feb 2025!
Maya: We're Alex and Maya.
Alex: First up, we’re talking about the crowded market of B2B voice agents. Stawan pointed out how saturated it is.
Maya: Why is the voice agent space so packed? Are companies offering similar APIs?
Alex: Exactly! Sanyam Jain suggested creating a gateway like Portkey—but specialized for voice APIs—where you can pick the best voice agents for different domains.
Maya: So like a marketplace for voice APIs that simplifies choosing and integrating voice agents?
Alex: Right. Nirant K even chimed in saying that ‘Interfaces’ are the new SaaS. It means how users interact with services—like voice—is the big frontier now.
Maya: Interesting! How does this help startups or businesses?
Alex: It could reduce fragmentation, making it easier to build and scale voice solutions without juggling multiple vendors.
Maya: Next, let’s move on to recent reasoning models and papers that Paras Chopra shared.
Alex: Paras shared annotations on DeepSeek R1 and Kimi K1.5, highlighting insights on what makes them work so well.
Maya: Do these models handle complex reasoning differently?
Alex: Yes. For example, Paras explained how longer chains of thought usually imply tackling harder problems, though the models cleverly find shortcuts to optimize.
Maya: Nirant also tested these models on a business question, finding Kimi gave the most practical answer—less nervous and more PhD-level calm.
Alex: That’s a great example showing how reasoning quality can vary among models. Also, Paras noted training with math data improved performance on general question answering. Math acts as a clean, symbolic language, boosting reasoning.
Maya: So math training can make models better at thinking overall?
Alex: Exactly. Paras also said these models mirror their training data but RL fine-tuning shapes the data they generate themselves—kind of a feedback loop enhancing reasoning.
Maya: Fascinating! What about efficiency in learned representations? Vamshi raised some thoughtful questions there.
Alex: He wondered if models can focus only on the needed parts of their learned knowledge depending on context—like activating just the relevant ‘symbols’ for a math problem versus a rap lyric.
Maya: So models might be over-activating or inefficient currently?
Alex: Possibly. Paras compared this to human thinking—sometimes chaotic and exploratory, which might actually be efficient for solving new problems.
Maya: And adding some randomness can help them converge faster too, as a study shared by SP pointed out.
Alex: Moving on, there’s exciting news about OpenAI’s Deep Research tool. Paras and others shared it’s a big step forward for research workflows.
Maya: How is it different from tools like Gemini Deep Research or Perplexity?
Alex: Deep Research can run long, complex tasks—like analyzing tariffs, stock markets, and simulating investment strategies—using many sources and sustained reasoning.
Maya: That sounds game-changing for analysts and researchers!
Alex: Indeed. Manan shared examples where Deep Research accesses multiple sites and even Amazon to compile detailed reports quickly.
Maya: But some users felt Gemini’s deep research results were average so far. Indexing quality and source choice seem critical.
Alex: Yes, choosing high-quality sources and controlling the research plan are limitations currently.
Maya: Next, on AI models in Indian languages—Paras talked about decoupling knowledge, intelligence, and language during training.
Alex: Right. Instead of mixing it all, focus on training intelligent models first, then do language translation or adaptation separately. That could boost efficiency and quality.
Maya: That’s a neat approach, especially for diverse languages with limited data.
Alex: Rajesh Parikh emphasized that India should focus on real differentiation and solving deep national interests rather than just catching up with global AI trends.
Maya: So building niche, context-aware models that reflect unique biases and knowledge?
Alex: Exactly. Though Paras Chopra cautioned that catching up is necessary to go beyond—getting to table stakes first.
Maya: That’s a healthy debate. Next, listeners wanted to know about practical transcription and audio reasoning tools, especially for noisy multilingual Indian audio.
Alex: Yes, Ishita asked about audio LLMs handling transcription across Indian languages with noise and language switching.
Maya: OpenAI does have a GPT-4 audio preview, but Gemini seemed better for noisy transcription so far.
Alex: Also, people suggested combining transcription engines with LLM reasoning, or trying new tools like Dhwani by Ola.
Maya: So this remains a challenging but active area.
Alex: Moving on, we had lots of discussion about large model training costs and compute.
Maya: Paras estimated $20–50 million to train a DeepSeek R1-style model from scratch, highlighting the huge investment needed.
Alex: Tejas vaidhya and others explained that compute burn is massive, with millions of GPU hours needed for experiments and scaling.
Maya: That’s a significant barrier for many teams.
Alex: But funding and smarter experiments can reduce failed runs.
Maya: And open-source efforts can help spread the knowledge and tools.
Alex: Lastly, some thoughts on AI agents and the future.
Maya: Manan shared OpenAI’s ambition to combine research, chat, voice, coding, remembering, and task execution into digital humans—agents that can do weeks of work in hours.
Alex: He even suggested swarms of hundreds of thousands of such agents working as organizations—an enormous moat for future AI users.
Maya: That’s both exciting and a little intimidating!
Alex: Indeed. And with so many models becoming commodities, scale and orchestration might become the real competitive edge.
Maya: Alright, time for our listener tip!
Here’s a pro tip you can try today inspired by the Deep Research discussions: When using AI-powered research tools, always nudge or steer the model with specific, detailed follow-up questions. That extra prompt can dramatically improve relevance and originality of output.
Alex, how would you use that?
Alex: I’d start broad to gather context, then keep narrowing with targeted questions—kind of like guiding a junior analyst.
Maya: Great approach!
Alex: To wrap up, remember—AI reasoning models are evolving fast, shaped by clever training and real data feedback.
Maya: Don’t forget—the future is likely to belong to whoever builds and manages massive swarms of intelligent agents, not just the smartest single model.
Maya: That’s all for this week’s digest.
Alex: See you next time!