One of the most important parts of scripture to understand is the creation account in Genesis. Many people, even good Christian people, dismiss the creation account as secondary. While we can get caught up in the debate and lose focus on the spreading of the Gospel, I want to posit that what a person believes about the creation account plays a significant role in how the view theology in general and most importantly, how they view the Gospel.

For the sake of this vlog, we obviously do not have time to dive into each of the views of creation and dissect them all so we will read what the scripture has to say and take it at face value.  

We do not have time to dissect the four major theories of creation but they are the gap theory, the day-age theory, the framework hypothesis, and a literal 6-day creation. 

Genesis 1 gives us the biblical account of creation and I encourage you to read through the entire chapter. The 1st day God created light and separated light from darkness, Day 2 God created the sea and the sky, Day 3 He create land and plant life, Day 4 He created the sun, moon, and stars, Day 5 He created the birds and aquatic life, Day 6 He created land animals and human beings, and on the 7th day, He rested from His work.  

So the book of Genesis tells us that God created every living thing that creeps on the earth in a 6 day time period. Where things begin to go amuck, is when people begin to interpret the scripture in all kinds of weird ways. We have been taught in school, on TV, and in books that the earth is millions and millions of years old. However, we do not find that time period in the scripture. If a person is going to believe the the earth is millions of years old, believe in evolution, and believe the Bible, then they have to place those millions of years somewhere in the creation account. 

Some want to place the millions of years before Genesis 1:1, Gap theorists want to place them in a gap between verse 1 & verse 2, still others want to spread the millions of years out over the 6 days of creation. What are all of these views doing, they are adding to scripture and Proverbs 30:6 tells us not to add to His word lest He reprove you and you be found a liar.

The Day-Age theory is another view that seeks to place the millions of years within the 6 day creation period. This is the idea that a day is like a 1000 years. They get this from 2 Peter 3:8 where is says that a day with the Lord is like 1000 years. But the verse goes on to say that 1000 years is like a day, so it cancels out their argument!

This seems to be the only time in scripture where people have a problem with the interpretation of the word day. They believe when the word day is used in Genesis that it doesn't literally mean a 24-hour time period, but it can mean a much longer time than that.  

Outside of Genesis 1, in the OT, the word day is used with a number 410 times. In every instance it means an ordinary day. Outside of Genesis, the word morning and evening appear together without the word day, 38 times and every single time it means an ordinary day. The word evening and morning appear together with the word day 23 times outside of genesis and in every single instance it means an ordinary day. The word night appears with the word day outside of Genesis 52 times and in every instance it means an ordinary day.  

If you read the creation account the language that is used is the evening and the morning were the first day, the evening and the morning were the second day, the evening and the morning were the third day, the evening and the morning were the fourth day, the evening and the morning were the fifth day, the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

What more could God do to convince people that it was an ordinary day? They say that the word day could mean 1000 years. But my question is, where does that get applied to other areas of scripture? 

When was the last time you were in a bible study and listening to the story of Jonah when he was in the big fish for three days, when has anyone ever stood up and said, wait a minute, a day with the Lord is like 1000 years, maybe Jonah was in the fish for 3000 years.

Or you are studying the book of Joshua and he marched around Jericho for 7 days and someone says wait a day with the Lord is like 1000 years, so Joshua marched around Jericho for 7000 years. That doesn't make sense.

What makes sense is the God created the world in 6 literal days just like the scripture says.  

Why is it important to have a correct interpretation and view of the first two chapters of Genesis? Because if the Bible can’t be trusted in the first two chapters, what makes it trustworthy throughout the rest of the book? 

The first eleven chapters of Genesis set the stage for the rest of the biblical story. You can’t understand the unfolding narrative of Scripture without Genesis 1–11. There is so much foundational material in these chapters for the rest of the Bible—e.g., creation, the fall, sin, the certainty of judgment, the necessity of a Savior, and the introduction of the gospel. To ignore these foundational doctrines would render the rest of the Bible as unintelligible and irrelevant.

Christian theology is based on the historical accuracy of the Genesis account. The concept of marriage comes right out of the creation account (Genesis 2:24) and is referenced by Jesus in all three Synoptic Gospels. Our Lord Himself acknowledges that man was created male and female “from the beginning of creation” (Matthew 19:4). These statements, to be comprehendible, rely on the historical accuracy of the Genesis creation account. Most importantly, the doctrine of salvation depends on the existence of a literal person named Adam. 

Twice in the Pauline Epistles (Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15), Paul links our salvation in Christ with our identification in Adam. In 1 Corinthians 15:21–22, we read, 20 But now is Christ risen from the dead and become the first fruits of those who have fallen asleep. 21 For since death came by man, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. 22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 

The entire human race is in a fallen state by virtue of being “in Adam” through natural birth. In similar manner, those whom God has chosen for salvation are saved by virtue of being “in Christ” through spiritual birth. The in Adam/in Christ distinction is crucial to a proper understanding of Christian soteriology, and this distinction makes no sense if there were no literal Adam from whom all humanity descended.

Paul argues in a similar vein in Romans 5:12 and says, “Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned”. This verse is the linchpin in the argument for total depravity, and, like the 1 Corinthians passage, it depends on a literal Adam for it to make any kind of sense. Without a literal Adam, there is no literal sin and no need for a literal Savior.

Without believing the literal Genesis account of creation, how can a person believe that we needed a real Savior to die on a real cross to take away our very real sin.