<p>There are plenty of misconceptions going around about evidentialism as opposed to Reformed Epistemology or presuppositionalism. Here I start a series intended to lay some of those confusions to rest.  Here is my former video on this topic:  https://youtu.be/k2Tv90y2G58 Here is a post I wrote on this topic some years back:  http://lydiaswebpage.blogspot.com/2020/08/what-evidentialism-is-not.html</p>

There are plenty of misconceptions going around about evidentialism as opposed to Reformed Epistemology or presuppositionalism. Here I start a series intended to lay some of those confusions to rest. Here is my former video on this topic: https://youtu.be/k2Tv90y2G58 Here is a post I wrote on this topic some years back: http://lydiaswebpage.blogspot.com/2020/08/what-evidentialism-is-not.html

<p>There are plenty of misconceptions going around about evidentialism as opposed to Reformed Epistemology or presuppositionalism. Here I start a series intended to lay some of those confusions to rest. &nbsp;Here is my former video on this topic: &nbsp;https://youtu.be/k2Tv90y2G58 Here is a post I wrote on this topic some years back: &nbsp;http://lydiaswebpage.blogspot.com/2020/08/what-evidentialism-is-not.html</p>

What Evidentialism is Not, Part 1

The goal: To take common sense about the Bible and make it rigorous.

I'm an analytic philosopher, specializing in theory of knowledge. I've published widely in both classical and formal epistemology. On this channel I'm applying my work in the theory of knowledge to the books of the Bible, especially the Gospels, and to apologetics, the defense of Christianity. My aim is to bring a combination of scholarly rigor and common sense to these topics, providing the skeptic with well-considered reasons to accept Christianity and the believer with well-argued ways to defend it.

Education

The goal: To take common sense about the Bible and make it rigorous. I'm an analytic philosopher, specializing in theory of knowledge. I've published widely in both classical and formal epistemology. On this channel I'm applying my work in the theory of knowledge to the books of the Bible, especially the Gospels, and to apologetics, the defense of Christianity. My aim is to bring a combination of scholarly rigor and common sense to these topics, providing the skeptic with well-considered reasons to accept Christianity and the believer with well-argued ways to defend it.

Share What Evidentialism is Not, Part 1

Sign up to save your podcasts

What Evidentialism is Not, Part 1

What Evidentialism is Not, Part 1