Send us Fan Mail

Corporate money keeps flooding Democratic primaries, yet Bernie Sanders endorsed progressives are still pulling off win after win. We dig into why that’s happening, starting with the one issue voters keep screaming about in every poll: cost of living. When rent, groceries, gas, childcare, and healthcare all spike at once, “status quo” politics stops sounding safe and starts sounding out of touch, and candidates who talk plainly about taking on corporations suddenly feel like the realistic option.

We walk through several races that show the pattern. From Montana’s Sam Forstag and the argument that authentic working class messaging can outperform consultant-approved moderation, to California’s Randy Viegas beating a better-funded, establishment-backed opponent, we challenge the tired “preferred opponent” logic and ask a blunt question: if a Democrat tries to look like a Republican-lite, why would anyone switch or even show up? We also talk about why smear tactics and personal-life controversies are losing power, especially when voters care more about how politicians vote than how pundits frame their character.

Then the conversation pivots into media narratives on Gaza and Israel-Palestine, focusing on Sam Harris’s claims about famine reporting and his stated reasons for refusing to debate critics. We argue over what the evidence shows, how moral frameworks get selectively applied, and why “who won the narrative” is often disconnected from what’s happening on the ground. We close with Norm Finkelstein’s warning about far-right influencers trying to launder their reputations through selective outrage, and why solidarity without universal human rights is just marketing.

Subscribe for more conversations like this, share the episode with someone who argues politics online, and leave a review with the moment you disagreed with us most. What part of the current political media ecosystem do you trust least?

Support the show