
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This episode explores the concept of interpretive asymmetry, a communication dynamic where one person uses depth and abstraction to evade accountability for their literal actions. By operating exclusively on a "vertical" plane of symbolism and hidden meanings, this individual—described as an unbalanced sage—creates a "monster" of a relationship where the other person feels managed and confused. This behavior is characterized as predatory fluency, a tactic that uses weaponized ambiguity to strike emotionally while retreating to a literal defense to deny any wrongdoing. Ultimately, the text argues that true wisdom requires an integration of both factual reality and deeper interpretation, warning that communication becomes a form of deception when it is no longer anchored to a shared, literal ground.
By Joseph Michael GarrityThis episode explores the concept of interpretive asymmetry, a communication dynamic where one person uses depth and abstraction to evade accountability for their literal actions. By operating exclusively on a "vertical" plane of symbolism and hidden meanings, this individual—described as an unbalanced sage—creates a "monster" of a relationship where the other person feels managed and confused. This behavior is characterized as predatory fluency, a tactic that uses weaponized ambiguity to strike emotionally while retreating to a literal defense to deny any wrongdoing. Ultimately, the text argues that true wisdom requires an integration of both factual reality and deeper interpretation, warning that communication becomes a form of deception when it is no longer anchored to a shared, literal ground.