Rocket.Chat, once celebrated as a beacon of open-source collaboration, became the center of a major controversy in 2023 when its parent company shifted key features—such as Omnichannel customer engagement and advanced security/compliance tools—from its open MIT License to a commercial model. This move, while driven by the need for financial sustainability, triggered widespread backlash from developers and organizations who had built their operations around the platform’s promise of free, self-hosted, and fully controllable communication. The community felt betrayed, viewing the change as a violation of open-source ethics, despite the legal permissiveness of the MIT License. Many contributors, who had donated time and code, felt exploited, leading to a fragmentation of trust and a quiet exodus to alternative platforms like Mattermost, Zulip, and Matrix. While Rocket.Chat continues to pursue a commercial enterprise strategy targeting large organizations, the incident has had lasting repercussions: it intensified scrutiny of open-core business models, raised concerns about the long-term reliability of company-backed open-source projects, and prompted developers to favor community-governed or foundation-backed initiatives. The episode underscores a growing tension in the tech world between the ideals of open collaboration and the economic realities of software development. It serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of transparency, community trust, and sustainable funding models. Today, the open-source landscape is more cautious, with users and contributors alike demanding clearer commitments and governance structures. Rocket.Chat’s transformation reflects a broader trend where ’free’ software increasingly comes with strategic limitations, forcing businesses and individuals to weigh cost, control, and ethical alignment when choosing their digital tools. The legacy of this shift is not just a fractured community, but a more mature, albeit more complex, conversation about how open-source innovation can endure without compromising its foundational principles.