Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share When is It Ethical to Impede a Trial’s Search for Truth? And the “One-Share” Judicial Recusal Rule
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
When is It Ethical to Impede a Trial’s Search for Truth? And the “One-Share” Judicial Recusal Rule
Stephen Gillers and Barbara Gillers analyze what lawyers can and cannot ethically do at trial to interfere with the search for truth. They then discuss the wisdom of the rule that requires a judge's recusal if he or she and certain family members own even a single share of stock in a party.
Stephen is the Elihu Root Professor of Law and Barbara is an Adjunct Professor of Law, both at New York University School of Law.
Join Professor Stephen Gillers for an October 17 Ethics CLE - see https://www.nycbar.org/cle
View all episodes
By Legal Ethics in the News - NYC Bar Association
4.3
1010 ratings
Stephen Gillers and Barbara Gillers analyze what lawyers can and cannot ethically do at trial to interfere with the search for truth. They then discuss the wisdom of the rule that requires a judge's recusal if he or she and certain family members own even a single share of stock in a party.
Stephen is the Elihu Root Professor of Law and Barbara is an Adjunct Professor of Law, both at New York University School of Law.
Join Professor Stephen Gillers for an October 17 Ethics CLE - see https://www.nycbar.org/cle