Cyber Law

When Missing CCTV Footage Destroys Cases ๐ŸŽฅ


Listen Later

๐ŸŽฅ The Digital Evidence Mystery

๐ŸŒŸ Picture this: A major criminal case depends entirely on one digital witness - CCTV camera footage. But what happens when that crucial footage mysteriously vanishes? How do courts handle this digital evidence puzzle in our modern world?

๐Ÿ’ก What You'll Discover:

  • ๐Ÿ” How Section 65B of the Evidence Act makes electronic records legally valid
  • โš–๏ธ The "Best Evidence Rule" - why original proof trumps witness statements
  • ๐ŸŽฏ When courts can assume missing evidence was unfavorable (Section 114 illustration)
  • ๐Ÿ“ฑ Why digital literacy is now mandatory for investigators and lawyers

๐Ÿš€ Real Cases Discussed:

  • ๐Ÿ’Ž State NCT of Delhi vs. Mukesh (2014) - Supreme Court case where missing CCTV footage overturned a conviction
  • โญ How prosecution's failure to present hotel surveillance footage led to case dismissal
  • ๐Ÿ›๏ธ Supreme Court's criticism of trial courts for accepting weak oral testimony over strong digital evidence

๐Ÿ”ง Practical Legal Strategies:

  • ๐Ÿ“‹ For Prosecution: Never rely on witness statements when original digital evidence is available
  • ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ For Defense: Challenge missing electronic evidence and demand originals
  • โšก How adverse inference under Section 114(g) can flip entire cases

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ This episode reveals how a simple procedural mistake with digital evidence can transform a winning case into a complete disaster - and what every legal professional needs to know about our digital future!

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Cyber LawBy Sharad Bansal