🏛️ The Religious Practice That Divided a Nation

🌟 Imagine something that's been practiced for 1400 years, considered a 'sin' by religious scholars, yet legally valid in courts. How does a legal system handle such contradictions? This is the fascinating story of instant triple talaq in India.

💡 What You'll Discover:

• 🔍 How one letter saying 'talaq, talaq, talaq' could end a marriage instantly
• ⚖️ The clash between fundamental rights and religious freedom (Articles 14, 15, 21 vs Article 25)
• 🎯 Why Supreme Court judges had completely different opinions on the same case
• 💭 The difference between personal law and constitutional rights

🚀 Real Cases Discussed:

• 💎 Shayara Bano vs. Union of India (2017) - The landmark case that banned instant triple talaq
• ⭐ Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 - How religious practices became statutory law
• 🏛️ All India Muslim Personal Law Board - The organization that defended the practice

🎪 The Great Legal Debate:

• 🤔 Can courts interfere in 1400-year-old religious practices?
• ⚡ When does religious freedom clash with gender equality?
• 🌍 How other Islamic countries already banned this practice
• 📜 The role of Article 13(1) in testing personal laws

🎙️ This episode reveals how India's Supreme Court navigated the complex intersection of religion, law, and human rights - setting a precedent that continues to shape legal discussions today!