Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Which Non-Invasive Esthetic Treatment Should You Pick?
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Which Non-Invasive Esthetic Treatment Should You Pick?
THE inquiry words "HIFU" and "Ulthera" are regularly utilized when searching for a non-obtrusive or non-careful facelift. A speedy Google search discovers a plenty of tasteful facilities offering both of these medicines, and a walk around a column of beauty parlors may likewise show some contribution HIFU medicines, as well.
Anyway, what truly is HIFU? How can it function? Furthermore, how can it vary from Ulthera? What are the distinctions of HIFU medicines offered by tasteful facilities and beauty parlors?
8. nose thread lift singapore
9. fractional laser treatment singapore
10. non invasive face lift singapore
What is HIFU?
HIFU represents High Intensity Focused Ultrasound. The guideline of how it functions is practically equivalent to Ulthera, the first gadget utilizing miniature centered ultrasound for non-obtrusive and non-careful facelift.
HIFU alludes to South Korean-made centered ultrasound gadgets and Ulthera, American made.
The two of them are medicines utilizing ultrasound energy centered to create a little yet thought warm warmth zone, bringing about controlled harm to the treated regions like the dermis and SMAS (Superficial Muscular Aponeurotic System, or tissue stick).
At first, spaces of the face - cheeks, submentum (underchin), infra-circles (undereye), temple and brow - were the territories treated. Therefore, the neck, décolleté (female upper chest) and surprisingly certain pieces of the body were supported for treatment.
It might amaze you to discover that engaged ultrasound has been around since the 1950s. Centered ultrasound energies were hypothesized by Frank and William Fry to create restricted "trackless" tissue harm.
Lamentably, in those days, the limits of accessible advances to screen and control this energy brought about HIFU being placed into the private alcoves of thoughts. Its resurgence in the mid 1990s in fields like gynecology, hepatology, urology spelled reestablished interest in centered ultrasound.
Which one is better - Ulthera or HIFU?
In 2008, Ulthera was industrially dispatched for stylish signs, accepting US FDA endorsements for non-intrusive temple lift (2009), non-obtrusive neck and submentum (underchin) lift (2012) and non-intrusive treatment of lines and wrinkles of the décolleté (female upper chest; 2014).
At first, HIFU gadgets were considered sloppy duplicate feline gadgets with ineffectively engaged ultrasound energies. Ensuing emphasess of Korean HIFU gadgets made great their lacks and shortcomings, bringing about significantly better forms with asserted efficacies equivalent, if not comparative, to that of Ulthera.
In an examination by Harker-Martinez (2016), 22 female patients matured somewhere in the range of 45 and 55 years were similarly parted into a two-arm study that set Ulthera in opposition to a main South Korean HIFU maker. Pre-and post-system photos were assessed by two free plastic specialists ignorant of what piece of the face was dealt with, thus, unfit to figure out which gadget was utilized for treatment.
As per that article, 85% of patients were exceptionally happy with the treatment. Furthermore, most patients announced no obvious contrasts between every 50% of their face. Just 13% of patients revealed moderate improvement and were taken to free subsequent treatment. Treatment results were exceptionally fulfilling for the two patients and doctors who tracked down no critical distinction in treatment results between the Ulthera and HIFU.
View all episodes
By RobertTHE inquiry words "HIFU" and "Ulthera" are regularly utilized when searching for a non-obtrusive or non-careful facelift. A speedy Google search discovers a plenty of tasteful facilities offering both of these medicines, and a walk around a column of beauty parlors may likewise show some contribution HIFU medicines, as well.
Anyway, what truly is HIFU? How can it function? Furthermore, how can it vary from Ulthera? What are the distinctions of HIFU medicines offered by tasteful facilities and beauty parlors?
8. nose thread lift singapore
9. fractional laser treatment singapore
10. non invasive face lift singapore
What is HIFU?
HIFU represents High Intensity Focused Ultrasound. The guideline of how it functions is practically equivalent to Ulthera, the first gadget utilizing miniature centered ultrasound for non-obtrusive and non-careful facelift.
HIFU alludes to South Korean-made centered ultrasound gadgets and Ulthera, American made.
The two of them are medicines utilizing ultrasound energy centered to create a little yet thought warm warmth zone, bringing about controlled harm to the treated regions like the dermis and SMAS (Superficial Muscular Aponeurotic System, or tissue stick).
At first, spaces of the face - cheeks, submentum (underchin), infra-circles (undereye), temple and brow - were the territories treated. Therefore, the neck, décolleté (female upper chest) and surprisingly certain pieces of the body were supported for treatment.
It might amaze you to discover that engaged ultrasound has been around since the 1950s. Centered ultrasound energies were hypothesized by Frank and William Fry to create restricted "trackless" tissue harm.
Lamentably, in those days, the limits of accessible advances to screen and control this energy brought about HIFU being placed into the private alcoves of thoughts. Its resurgence in the mid 1990s in fields like gynecology, hepatology, urology spelled reestablished interest in centered ultrasound.
Which one is better - Ulthera or HIFU?
In 2008, Ulthera was industrially dispatched for stylish signs, accepting US FDA endorsements for non-intrusive temple lift (2009), non-obtrusive neck and submentum (underchin) lift (2012) and non-intrusive treatment of lines and wrinkles of the décolleté (female upper chest; 2014).
At first, HIFU gadgets were considered sloppy duplicate feline gadgets with ineffectively engaged ultrasound energies. Ensuing emphasess of Korean HIFU gadgets made great their lacks and shortcomings, bringing about significantly better forms with asserted efficacies equivalent, if not comparative, to that of Ulthera.
In an examination by Harker-Martinez (2016), 22 female patients matured somewhere in the range of 45 and 55 years were similarly parted into a two-arm study that set Ulthera in opposition to a main South Korean HIFU maker. Pre-and post-system photos were assessed by two free plastic specialists ignorant of what piece of the face was dealt with, thus, unfit to figure out which gadget was utilized for treatment.
As per that article, 85% of patients were exceptionally happy with the treatment. Furthermore, most patients announced no obvious contrasts between every 50% of their face. Just 13% of patients revealed moderate improvement and were taken to free subsequent treatment. Treatment results were exceptionally fulfilling for the two patients and doctors who tracked down no critical distinction in treatment results between the Ulthera and HIFU.