
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This week we introduce some of the basic ideas and methods of the form critics who pioneered much of the skepticism we see directed at the Bible over 100 years ago. Do their ideas still hold up today?
“The works of our Savior were always present, for they were true: those who were healed, those who rose from the dead, those who were not only seen in the act of being healed or raised, but were also always present, not merely when the Savior was living on the earth, but also for a considerable time after his departure, so that some of them survived even to our own times.” Eusebius quoting from Quadratus, Eusebius, Hist. Eccl., p. 4.3.2
“It is a curious fact that nearly all the contentions of the early form critics have by now been convincingly refuted, but the general picture of the process of oral transmission that form critics pioneered still governs the way most New Testament scholars think.” Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses, 2006
By Ron CampbellThis week we introduce some of the basic ideas and methods of the form critics who pioneered much of the skepticism we see directed at the Bible over 100 years ago. Do their ideas still hold up today?
“The works of our Savior were always present, for they were true: those who were healed, those who rose from the dead, those who were not only seen in the act of being healed or raised, but were also always present, not merely when the Savior was living on the earth, but also for a considerable time after his departure, so that some of them survived even to our own times.” Eusebius quoting from Quadratus, Eusebius, Hist. Eccl., p. 4.3.2
“It is a curious fact that nearly all the contentions of the early form critics have by now been convincingly refuted, but the general picture of the process of oral transmission that form critics pioneered still governs the way most New Testament scholars think.” Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses, 2006