Proposal Analyzed:

Permanent U.S. control of the Strait of Hormuz, modeled on the Korean DMZ.

Core Flaws of This Plan:

-Geographic mismatch: Korean DMZ model is unsuitable for the Strait's maritime and coastal terrain.

-Massive ground invasion required: A coastal buffer zone necessitates a large-scale occupation of Iranian territory.

-Prohibitive costs: Estimated at $220 billion initially and $50 billion annually, dwarfing the cost of the U.S. presence in Korea.

-Ineffective against Iranian defenses: A static coastal line cannot counter Iran's layered anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) strategy, which includes:

-Sea mines

-Fast attack craft swarms

-Mobile, long-range anti-ship missiles launched from deep inland

Alternative Strategies Examined & Dismissed:

-Historical convoy escorts: Impractical, costly, and cannot guarantee lane security against modern threats.

Proposed Viable Solution:

-Naval blockade in the open Arabian Sea.

-This approach targets Iran's economy directly, avoids a ground invasion, and bypasses the A2/AD kill zone within the strait.

✅Youtube video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twy_P0-d6p8