
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode of the Cognixia podcast, the discussion centers on a recent lawsuit filed by Dow Jones and the New York Post against Perplexity AI. The publishers accuse Perplexity of using their copyrighted content without authorization for its AI-generated summaries, a practice they argue undercuts content discoverability and revenue. Unlike Google, which supports content discovery through its AI summaries, Perplexity allegedly bypasses this, impacting publishers’ revenue models. The lawsuit also highlights concerns over "hallucinated" content, where Perplexity generates false information. This ongoing legal battle underscores tensions between media companies and AI firms over content usage rights and compensation.
By CognixiaIn this episode of the Cognixia podcast, the discussion centers on a recent lawsuit filed by Dow Jones and the New York Post against Perplexity AI. The publishers accuse Perplexity of using their copyrighted content without authorization for its AI-generated summaries, a practice they argue undercuts content discoverability and revenue. Unlike Google, which supports content discovery through its AI summaries, Perplexity allegedly bypasses this, impacting publishers’ revenue models. The lawsuit also highlights concerns over "hallucinated" content, where Perplexity generates false information. This ongoing legal battle underscores tensions between media companies and AI firms over content usage rights and compensation.