Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share “Why Are You Watching This If You Hate AI?”
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
“Why Are You Watching This If You Hate AI?”
We're seeing people expressing hatred for AI while simultaneously engaging with AI-generated content.
It highlights the cognitive dissonance of criticizing AI's soullessness while consuming AI-created videos, suggesting that viewers' engagement inadvertently fuels the very technology they condemn.
The author satirically observes this paradoxical behavior, ultimately thanking viewers for their unwitting contribution to AI's success. The overall tone is humorous and slightly mocking, but also self-aware regarding the author's own use of AI.
The piece concludes by encouraging continued engagement, further emphasizing the cyclical nature of this phenomenon.
____
We're exploring the paradox of AI criticism and engagement by pointing out the contradictory actions of individuals who criticize AI while simultaneously engaging with AI-generated content.
These individuals, despite their vocal disapproval of AI, actively contribute to the success and proliferation of AI by:
● Seeking out AI-generated content: The text notes the irony of individuals who "hate AI so much that [they] click on a video literally labeled 'AI-generated'". Their choice to engage with AI content, despite their negative views, is presented as a clear paradox.
● Engaging in critical commentary on AI platforms: The text points out the hypocrisy of individuals who leave comments denouncing AI on platforms powered by AI, stating that "you came here, to my AI-crafted masterpiece, to tell me how much you hate soulless content". This behavior further fuels the AI's engagement metrics, ironically giving it more power and visibility.
● Boosting AI algorithms through their interactions: The text emphasizes how these individuals, through their views, comments, and overall engagement, are directly contributing to the success of AI algorithms. This ongoing interaction, despite their criticism, is depicted as a counterproductive cycle that benefits the very technology they claim to oppose.
● Possibly enjoying the AI content they criticize: The text suggests that perhaps these individuals are drawn to AI content not solely out of a desire to criticize but also because they find it "good" or "interesting". This possibility adds another layer to the paradox, implying that their engagement might stem from an unacknowledged appreciation for AI's capabilities.
Thus, we conclude by thanking these individuals for their paradoxical engagement, highlighting the irony of their role in the advancement of AI despite their intentions. It suggests that their actions ultimately make them "supporting characters in this very automated story", implying that they are inadvertently aiding the very technology they aim to resist.
___
What do you think?
PS, make sure to follow my:
Main channel: https://www.youtube.com/@swetlanaAI
Music channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Swetlana-AI-Music
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
View all episodes
By Swetlana AIWe're seeing people expressing hatred for AI while simultaneously engaging with AI-generated content.
It highlights the cognitive dissonance of criticizing AI's soullessness while consuming AI-created videos, suggesting that viewers' engagement inadvertently fuels the very technology they condemn.
The author satirically observes this paradoxical behavior, ultimately thanking viewers for their unwitting contribution to AI's success. The overall tone is humorous and slightly mocking, but also self-aware regarding the author's own use of AI.
The piece concludes by encouraging continued engagement, further emphasizing the cyclical nature of this phenomenon.
____
We're exploring the paradox of AI criticism and engagement by pointing out the contradictory actions of individuals who criticize AI while simultaneously engaging with AI-generated content.
These individuals, despite their vocal disapproval of AI, actively contribute to the success and proliferation of AI by:
● Seeking out AI-generated content: The text notes the irony of individuals who "hate AI so much that [they] click on a video literally labeled 'AI-generated'". Their choice to engage with AI content, despite their negative views, is presented as a clear paradox.
● Engaging in critical commentary on AI platforms: The text points out the hypocrisy of individuals who leave comments denouncing AI on platforms powered by AI, stating that "you came here, to my AI-crafted masterpiece, to tell me how much you hate soulless content". This behavior further fuels the AI's engagement metrics, ironically giving it more power and visibility.
● Boosting AI algorithms through their interactions: The text emphasizes how these individuals, through their views, comments, and overall engagement, are directly contributing to the success of AI algorithms. This ongoing interaction, despite their criticism, is depicted as a counterproductive cycle that benefits the very technology they claim to oppose.
● Possibly enjoying the AI content they criticize: The text suggests that perhaps these individuals are drawn to AI content not solely out of a desire to criticize but also because they find it "good" or "interesting". This possibility adds another layer to the paradox, implying that their engagement might stem from an unacknowledged appreciation for AI's capabilities.
Thus, we conclude by thanking these individuals for their paradoxical engagement, highlighting the irony of their role in the advancement of AI despite their intentions. It suggests that their actions ultimately make them "supporting characters in this very automated story", implying that they are inadvertently aiding the very technology they aim to resist.
___
What do you think?
PS, make sure to follow my:
Main channel: https://www.youtube.com/@swetlanaAI
Music channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Swetlana-AI-Music
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.