
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


“Do you do EMDR?”
It’s one of the most common first questions in therapy.
It makes sense. When you’re struggling, you want something that works. You want certainty. You want to reduce the risk of wasting time.
But a method is a tool. And tools come after we understand what we’re dealing with.
In this episode, I examine why starting with the method can quietly distract from structural assessment. One overwhelming event is not the same as years of adaptive survival patterns — even if both are labelled “trauma.”
We look at:
– Why symptom similarity does not mean structural similarity
– The difference between single-incident trauma and developmental adaptation
– Why choosing a method first can create false clarity
– Why assessment must precede intervention
This is not a critique of EMDR.
It is a clarification of sequence :
Understanding first.
Tool second.
By Gijs van Breugel“Do you do EMDR?”
It’s one of the most common first questions in therapy.
It makes sense. When you’re struggling, you want something that works. You want certainty. You want to reduce the risk of wasting time.
But a method is a tool. And tools come after we understand what we’re dealing with.
In this episode, I examine why starting with the method can quietly distract from structural assessment. One overwhelming event is not the same as years of adaptive survival patterns — even if both are labelled “trauma.”
We look at:
– Why symptom similarity does not mean structural similarity
– The difference between single-incident trauma and developmental adaptation
– Why choosing a method first can create false clarity
– Why assessment must precede intervention
This is not a critique of EMDR.
It is a clarification of sequence :
Understanding first.
Tool second.