
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Since intellectual atheism took root in the late 1700s with courageous thinkers like Denis Diderot and Baron d’Holbach, the core focus has often been on advocating for reason, science, and humanism. However, this intellectual movement often neglected the need for rigorous self-criticism and failing to grapple with atheism's negative implications, a task undertaken by later philosophers like Friedrich Nietzsche.
This audio summarizes the potential negative logical and historical implications that arise from the assumption of atheism.
In this episode, we explore the inevitable consequences of a godless universe, including:
We also discuss tactics many modern atheists use to avoid being intellectually self-critical, such as retreating into "personal atheism" (merely a lack of faith) or relying solely on the "burden of proof" argument
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Daniel SinclairSince intellectual atheism took root in the late 1700s with courageous thinkers like Denis Diderot and Baron d’Holbach, the core focus has often been on advocating for reason, science, and humanism. However, this intellectual movement often neglected the need for rigorous self-criticism and failing to grapple with atheism's negative implications, a task undertaken by later philosophers like Friedrich Nietzsche.
This audio summarizes the potential negative logical and historical implications that arise from the assumption of atheism.
In this episode, we explore the inevitable consequences of a godless universe, including:
We also discuss tactics many modern atheists use to avoid being intellectually self-critical, such as retreating into "personal atheism" (merely a lack of faith) or relying solely on the "burden of proof" argument
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.