Patent Law

Why New Isn't Enough for Patents ๐Ÿ”ฌ


Listen Later

๐Ÿ”ฌ The Patent Puzzle That Trips Up Every Inventor

๐ŸŒŸ You've created something completely new - surely that's enough for a patent, right? Wrong! This episode reveals the mysterious "inventive step" requirement that separates true innovations from obvious improvements.

๐Ÿ’ก What You'll Discover:

  • ๐Ÿ” Why being "new" isn't enough - the three crucial tests every patent must pass
  • โš–๏ธ The imaginary "skilled person" who decides your invention's fate
  • ๐ŸŽฏ How to prove your idea isn't just an "obvious next step"
  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ The difference between technical advancement and economic significance

๐Ÿš€ Real Cases Discussed:

  • ๐Ÿ’Ž Vishwanath Prasad Radheshyam vs. Hindustan Metal Industries - The Supreme Court case that defined true invention
  • โญ Section 2(1)(j) of Indian Patent Act - The legal framework that separates innovation from imitation

๐Ÿค– Future Challenges:

  • ๐Ÿš€ How AI is changing what counts as "obvious" to a skilled person
  • ๐Ÿ”ฎ Will artificial intelligence itself become the new standard for measuring creativity?

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Perfect for inventors, entrepreneurs, and anyone curious about what makes an idea truly patent-worthy in our rapidly evolving tech world!

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Patent LawBy Sharad Bansal