In this video, I discuss the latest New England Journal of Medicine study on time-restricted feeding and some exceptionally bad takes on it. In particular, I detail how Andrew Huberman appears not to have read the study and mischaracterizes it on Twitter. Then, I talk about how Satchin Panda and Rhonda Patrick each mis-state important facts about and misinterpret the study’s significance. I use these examples as a sounding board to explain what we can in fact take away from the study—and indeed, from the research on time-restricted feeding to date.===Like, comment, subscribe.For more, find me at:PODCAST The Kevin Bass ShowYOUTUBE https://www.youtube.com/user/kbassphiladelphiaWEBSITE http://thedietwars.comTWITTER https://twitter.com/kevinnbass/https://twitter.com/healthmisinfo/INSTAGRAM https://instagram.com/kevinnbass/TIKTOK https://tiktok.com/@kevinnbassAnd above all, please donate to support what I do:PATREON https://patreon.com/kevinnbass/DONATE https://thedietwars.com/support-me/