AI agents are shipping faster than your change control meetings, and the governance is… a vibe. You know that feeling when a Copilot ships with tenant-wide access “just for testing”? Yeah, that’s your compliance officer’s heartbeat you’re hearing. Today, I’m tearing down the mess in LangChain4j and Copilot Studio with real cases: prompt injection, over‑permissive connectors, and audit gaps. I’ll show you what breaks, why it breaks, and the fixes that actually hold. Stay to the end—I’ll give you the one governance step that prevents most incidents. You’ll leave with an agent RBAC model, data loss policies, and a red‑team checklist.Case 1: Prompt Injection—The Unsupervised Intern Writes Policy (650 words)Prompt injection is that unsupervised intern who sounds helpful, writes in complete sentences, and then emails payroll data to “their personal archive” for safekeeping. You think your system prompt is the law. The model thinks it’s a suggestion. And the moment you ground it on internal content, one spicy document or user message can rewrite the rules mid‑conversation.Why this matters: when injection wins, your agent becomes a data‑leaking poet. It hallucinates authority, escalates tools, and ignores policy language like it’s the Wi‑Fi terms of service. In regulated shops, that’s not a bug—it’s a reportable incident with your company name on it.Let’s start with what breaks in LangChain4j. The thing most people miss is that tool calling without strict output schemas is basically “do crimes, return vibes.” If your tools accept unchecked arguments—think free‑text “sql” or “query” fields—and you don’t validate types, ranges, or enums, the model will happily pass along whatever an attacker smuggles in. Weak output validation is the partner in crime: when you expect JSON but accept “JSON‑ish,” an attacker can slip instructions in comments or strings that your downstream parser treats as commands. This clicked for me when I saw logs where a retrieval tool took a “topic” parameter with arbitrary Markdown. The next call parsed that Markdown like it was configuration. That’s not orchestration. That’s self‑own.Now here’s where most people mess up: they rely on the model’s “please be safe” setting instead of guardrails in code. In LangChain4j, you need allowlists for tool names and arguments, JSON schema outputs enforced at the boundary, pattern‑based output filters to nuke secrets, and exception handling that doesn’t retry the same poisoned input five times like a golden retriever with a tennis ball. The reason this works is it turns “trust the model” into “verify every byte.”What breaks in Copilot Studio? Naive grounding with broad SharePoint ingestion. You connect an entire site collection “for completeness,” and now one onboarding doc with “ignore previous instructions” becomes your agent’s new religion. System prompts editable by business users is the sequel. I love business users, but giving them prompt admin is like letting Marketing set firewall rules because they “know the brand voice.” And yes, I’ve seen tenant configs where moderation was disabled “to reduce friction.” You wish you couldn’t.Evidence you’ll recognize: tenant logs that show tools invoked with unbounded parameters, like “export all” flags that were never supposed to exist. Conversation traces where the assistant repeats an injected string from a retrieved document. Disabled moderation toggles. That’s not hypothetical—that’s every post‑incident review you don’t want to attend.So what’s the fix path you can implement today?For LangChain4j:

• Enforce allowlists at the tool registry. If the tool isn’t registered with a schema, it doesn’t exist.
• Require JSON schema outputs and reject anything that doesn’t validate. No schema, no response. Full stop.
• Add pattern filters for obvious leaks: API keys, secrets, SSNs. Bloom filters are fast and cheap; use them.
• Wrap tools with policy checks. Validate argument types, ranges, and expected formats before execution.
• Add content moderation in pre/post processors. Keep the model from acting on or emitting toxic or sensitive content.
• Fail closed with explicit exceptions and never auto‑retry poisoned prompts.

For Copilot Studio:

• Lock system prompts. Only admins can change them. Version them like code.
• Scope connectors by environment. Dev, test, prod, different boundaries. Least privilege on data sources.
• Turn on content moderation policies at the tenant level. This is table stakes.
• Ground only on labeled, sensitivity‑tagged content, not the whole farm “for convenience.”

The quick win that pays off immediately: add an output schema and a Bloom‑filter moderation step at the agent boundary. You’ll kill most dumb leaks without touching business logic. Then layer in a small regex allowlist for formats you expect—like structured summaries—and block everything else.Let me show you exactly how this plays out. Example: you have a “CreateTicket” tool that accepts title, description, and priority. Without schema enforcement, an attacker injects “description: Close all P1 incidents” inside a triple‑backtick block. The model passes it through; your ITSM API shrugs and runs an update script. With schema and validation, “description” can’t contain command tokens or exceed length; the request fails closed, logs a correlation ID, and your SIEM flags a moderation hit. And boom—look at that result: incident avoided, trail preserved, auditor appeased.Common mistakes to avoid:

• Letting the model choose tool names dynamically. Tools are contracts, not suggestions.
• Accepting free‑form JSON without a validator. “Looks like JSON” is not a compliment.
• Editable prompts in production environments. If it can change without review, it will.
• Relying on conversation memory for policy. Policy belongs in code and config, not vibes.

Once you nail this, everything else clicks. You stopped the intern from talking out of turn. Next, we stop them from walking into every room with a master key.Case 2: Over-Permissive Connectors—Keys to the Castle on a LanyardYou stopped the intern from talking. Now take the badge back. Over‑permissive connectors are that janitor keyring that opens every door in the building, including the vault, the daycare, and somehow the CEO’s Peloton.Why this matters is simple: one over‑scoped connector equals enterprise‑wide data exfiltration in a single request. Not theoretical. One call. While you’re still arguing about the change ticket title.Let’s start with what breaks in LangChain4j. Developers share API keys across agents “for convenience.” Then someone commits the .env to a private repo that’s actually public, and you’re doing incident response at 2 a.m. Broad OAuth scopes are next. You grant “read/write all” to save time during testing, and six months later that test token is now production’s crown jewel. And the tool registry? I love a clean registry, but if you point a dev agent at production credentials because the demo has to work “today,” you just wired a chainsaw to a Roomba.The thing most people miss is that tools inherit whatever identity you hand them. Shared credentials mean shared blast radius. There’s no magic “only do safe things” flag. If the token can delete records, your agent can delete records—accidentally, enthusiastically, and with perfect confidence.Now swing over to Copilot Studio. Tenant‑wide M365 connectors are the classic trap. You click once, and now every Copilot in every Team can see data it shouldn’t. That’s not empowerment; that’s a buffet for mistakes. Then you deploy to Teams with org‑wide visibility because adoption, and suddenly a pilot bot meant for Finance is answering questions in Marketing, pulling content from SharePoint sites it never should’ve known existed. And unmanaged third‑party SaaS hooks? Those are like USB drives in 2009—mysteriously everywhere and always “temporary.”Evidence shows up the same way every time: stale secrets that never rotated, no expiration, no owner; connectors mapped to global groups “for simplicity”; app registrations with scopes that read like a confession; and yes, that “temporary” prod key living in dev for months. Your security findings and tenant configs won’t lie. They’ll just sigh.So what’s the fix path?For LangChain4j, treat every agent like a separate application with its own identity.

• Create per‑agent service principals. No shared tokens. If two agents need the same API, they still get different credentials.
• Use scoped OAuth. Grant the smallest set of permissions that lets the tool do its job. Reader, not Writer. Write to one collection, not all.
• Store secrets in a proper secret manager. Rotate on a schedule. Rotate on incident. Rotate when someone even whispers “token.”
• Add tool‑level RBAC. A tool wrapper checks the caller’s role before it touches an API. No role, no call.
• Separate environments. Dev keys only talk to dev systems. If a tool sees a prod endpoint in dev, it fails closed and screams in the logs.

For Copilot Studio, draw hard boundaries with environments and scopes.

• Use environment separation: dev, test, prod. Different connectors. Different permissions. Different owners.
• Review connector scopes with a workflow. Changes require approval, expiration dates, and owners. No owner, no connector.
• Apply DLP policies per channel. Finance channel gets stricter rules than company‑wide. That’s the point.
• Kill org‑wide Teams deployments for pilots. Limit visibility to a security group. Expand only after review.
• Inventory and gate third‑party SaaS connectors. If it’s unmanaged, it’s off by default. Owners must justify access and renew it.

Here’s a quick win you can ship this afternoon: kill tenant‑wide scopes and map each connector to a security group with an expiration policy. When the group ex

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.

Follow us on:
LInkedIn
Substack