The Delve Podcast

You Are Allowed to Keep Doing What You’re Doing


Listen Later

==Media Links==
Website: delvepsych.com
Instagram: @delvepsychchicago
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@DelvePsych20
Substack: https://delvepsych.substack.com/


==Participants==
Ali McGarel
Adam W. Fominaya

==Overview of Big Ideas==

  • The 50th episode opens with Ali and Adam reflecting on the podcast itself: the pleasure of dialogue, public thinking, and watching ideas become sharper over time.
  • The central claim: insight does not automatically require change. Understanding why you do something does not mean you must stop doing it.
  • Psychodynamic work can reveal how childhood strategies were adaptive in their original context, even if they now create friction.
  • Change and non-change both carry consequences. The question is not “What is the correct choice?” but “Which consequences are you willing to live with?”
  • Client autonomy matters. Therapists can notice, question, and challenge, but they should not coerce clients into the therapist’s preferred values.
  • A therapist can “fight” for a client’s stated goals, but that is different from imposing goals the client has not chosen.
  • In relationships, repeatedly asking someone to change may eventually require accepting that they have declined. Then the question becomes what you will do with that reality.

==Breakdown of Segments==

  • 50th episode reflection: Ali and Adam exchange appreciation, discuss the podcast’s growth, and reflect on dialogue as a way to build clearer ideas.
  • Why insight is not the same as change: Adam distinguishes psychodynamic awareness from behavioral change; Ali names the missing step of choosing whether to act.
  • Childhood adaptation and adult context: emotional guardedness may have once helped someone survive their family system, while later frustrating a romantic partner.
  • The right to remain the same: the hosts explore a person who understands their emotional avoidance but still chooses not to become highly emotionally expressive.
  • Consequences either way: changing can cost something; not changing can cost something; neither path is consequence-free.
  • Autonomy in therapy: a testing anecdote illustrates that clients can stop, refuse, or choose against the clinician’s preference.
  • When challenge is ethical: Adam describes challenging clients when their behavior conflicts with goals they have clearly stated.
  • Fighting for the client’s values: the therapist’s pressure is framed as legitimate only when it serves the client’s own chosen direction.
  • Relationship impasse: the closing quote turns the theme outward: if someone keeps declining your request that they change, your remaining task is deciding what you will do.

==AI Recommended References==
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.

Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Prochaska, J. O., Norcross, J. C., & DiClemente, C. C. (1994). Changing for good. William Morrow.

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

The Delve PodcastBy Delve Psych