
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us Fan Mail
Private Advisory for Boards and CFOs: https://www.jhstrategicit.com/
Seventy two percent of CFOs are now leading the IT budgeting process. Forty one percent of CIOs have lost decisions that used to be exclusively theirs. This is not a trend. In most organizations it is already done.
This transfer of authority did not happen because finance wanted to run technology. It happened because IT leadership stopped being aligned with the business. The CIO optimizes for technology. The CFO runs a business. When nobody builds the bridge between those two things, finance fills the vacuum to protect the balance sheet. I call this Authority Migration, the structural shift that occurs when technology leadership cannot defend capital decisions and financial control absorbs the function.
The CFO is now approving spend they do not have the context to evaluate. Modernization programs approved on competitive necessity. SaaS spreading across departments because nobody came to the business and asked where the problems were. Rising IT costs with no clear line to business outcomes. That is not a technology problem. That is what happens when the CIO stopped listening to the business.
Before any technology capital gets approved, three questions need answers. How does this deployment change the unit economics of the business. Which financial variable moves if it succeeds. What is the exposure if the savings assumption fails. If your IT leadership cannot answer those three questions, the proposal is not ready.
This channel covers board-level technology governance and the decisions executives make when IT spend stops being defensible. Subscribe for briefings designed for leaders who approve and defend enterprise technology investment.
By Jayson HahnSend us Fan Mail
Private Advisory for Boards and CFOs: https://www.jhstrategicit.com/
Seventy two percent of CFOs are now leading the IT budgeting process. Forty one percent of CIOs have lost decisions that used to be exclusively theirs. This is not a trend. In most organizations it is already done.
This transfer of authority did not happen because finance wanted to run technology. It happened because IT leadership stopped being aligned with the business. The CIO optimizes for technology. The CFO runs a business. When nobody builds the bridge between those two things, finance fills the vacuum to protect the balance sheet. I call this Authority Migration, the structural shift that occurs when technology leadership cannot defend capital decisions and financial control absorbs the function.
The CFO is now approving spend they do not have the context to evaluate. Modernization programs approved on competitive necessity. SaaS spreading across departments because nobody came to the business and asked where the problems were. Rising IT costs with no clear line to business outcomes. That is not a technology problem. That is what happens when the CIO stopped listening to the business.
Before any technology capital gets approved, three questions need answers. How does this deployment change the unit economics of the business. Which financial variable moves if it succeeds. What is the exposure if the savings assumption fails. If your IT leadership cannot answer those three questions, the proposal is not ready.
This channel covers board-level technology governance and the decisions executives make when IT spend stops being defensible. Subscribe for briefings designed for leaders who approve and defend enterprise technology investment.