Send us Fan Mail

Private Advisory for Boards and CFOs: https://www.jhstrategicit.com/

Every chief title added to IT without fiduciary accountability changes how capital moves through your organization. The org chart your board approved is not an administrative diagram. It is a capital deployment decision.

When capital decisions require consensus from nine or ten people, none of whom carry personal fiduciary consequence for the outcome, approval velocity collapses. Projects that should take weeks take years. In one organization I led, a project ran so long the vendor went out of business before deployment. The capital was spent. The return never came. That outcome was not a leadership failure. It was a structural inevitability produced by the org chart the board approved.

I call this Authority Migration. Authority Migration is the structural shift that occurs when capital decisions move through negotiation rather than ownership and no single executive carries accountability for the outcome. When Authority Migration is complete, the CFO fills the vacuum. Finance always fills the gap that operations leaves open. The board that approved the structure owns the consequence.

The next capital request to add a chief title to IT is not an HR decision. It is a capital governance decision.

This channel covers board-level technology governance and the decisions executives make when IT spend stops being defensible. Subscribe for briefings designed for leaders who approve and defend enterprise technology investment.