Hey friends 👋

You know the pattern: solid revenue, happy customers, no churn. Everything looks like it’s working. So you go to raise money to hire sales reps and scale — and investors pass. They say “we want to see more traction,” and you nod like you understand, then go burn more of your network to get more of the same sales that got you here. The cycle repeats.

The problem isn’t your product. It’s that having revenue and having a repeatable sales motion are two completely different things. We dig into how to tell them apart — and introduce a stupid-simple tool called the acquisition source audit that can show you exactly where your deals are actually coming from.

Three scenarios this week, each with a different relationship to this problem. A data platform swimming in warm intros with no cold evidence to show investors, a FinTech compliance tool with multiple channels but some sketchy cold outreach math, and a bootstrapped workflow automation play that somehow figured it out without ever touching their network. We run each one through the source audit and rate conviction on our scale of zero to 10.

And in Frivolous Thoughts: SXSW, an obscure New Zealander entomologist, and why you can blame the Weimar Republic for your toddler’s ruined sleep schedule.

As always, thanks for listening.

—Cameron and JDM

Timestamps

00:00 - Introduction + big news (two episodes a week now 👀)

04:30 - Revenue vs. repeatable sales motion

08:00 - The acquisition source audit

11:30 - Scenario 1: Data analytics platform, $41K MRR, 83% warm intros

19:00 - Scenario 2: FinTech compliance tool, $87K MRR, mixed channels

27:30 - Scenario 3: Insurance workflow automation, $52K MRR, 100% cold outbound

35:00 - Frivolous Thoughts: SXSW + the surprisingly weird history of daylight saving time

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit zerototraction.substack.com