Relatore: Nicola Riva (Università di Milano)
6a lezione
Questa lezione si concentra sull'analisi filosofica delle differenze. Si ricerca in quali modi, da un punto di vista etico, sia possibile trattare le differenze. Si richiamano inoltre i paradigmi filosofici che hanno valorizzato l'inclusività.
BIBLIOGRAFIA
N., Sexuality,
Morals and Justice: A Theory of Lesbian and Gay Rights Law,
Judith, Is
Kinship Always Already Heterosexual?,
“Differences”, vol. 13, 2002, pp. 14-44.
J., Homosexuality
and the PIB Argument,
“Ethics”, vol. 115, 2005, pp. 501-534.
P., The
Enforcement of Morals,
Oxford University Press, London, 1959.
J., Law,
Morality, and ‘Sexual Orientation’,
“Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy”, vol. 9,
R. P., Bradley, G. V., Marriage
and the Liberal Imagination,
“Georgetown Law Journal”, vol. 84, 1995, pp. 301-319.
H. L. A., Law,
Liberty, and Morality,
Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1963.
S., Homosexuality
and the Conservative Mind,
“Georgetown Law Journal”, vol. 84, 1995, pp. 261-300.
S., Against
the Old Sexual Morality of the New Natural Law,
in R. P. George (ed.), Natural
Law, Liberalism, and Morality,
Oxford University Press, Oxford 1996, pp. 27-48.
S., Sexuality
and Liberty: Making Room for Nature and Tradition?,
in D. M. Estlund, M. C. Nussbaum (eds.), Sex,
Preference, and Familiy,
Oxford University Press, New York 1997, pp. 86-101.
A
Defense of Lesbian and Gay Rights,
in Id., Sex
and Social Justice,
Oxford University Press, New York 1999, pp. 184-210.
A
Right to Marry?,
“California Law Review”, vol. 98,
M. C., From
Disgust to Humanity: Sexual Orientation and Constitutional Law,
Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010 (di imminente traduzione per Il
D. A. J., The
Case for Gay Rights: From Bowers to Lawrence and Beyond,
University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, 2005.
C. R., The
Right to Marry,
“Cardozo Law Review”, vol. 26, 2005, pp. 2081-2120.