本期嘉宾：Charlie

收听地图

0:00-1:14｜激情Intro

1:15-3:21｜MBTI是从哪冒出来的

3:22-5:20｜我们没那么“ISFJ”了

5:21-22:47｜为I人发声：“关我什么事”和“关你什么事”

22:48-30:58｜T人和F人的巅峰对决

30:59-36:04｜P人的那些事，J人光听就已经焦虑了

36:05-40:26｜伦敦上学一年，我直接从大S变成大N

40:27-46:05｜请你随意标签化我

46:06-48:36｜我们的出厂设置会是什么MBTI

48:37-52:36｜Close：我不再寻找全部的、真实的自我

52:37-56:13｜结尾文章阅读时间：Authenticity Under Fire

配乐

Lvyan - Take Me Away

Jasing Rye - Cerf-volant

渡辺雅二 - Verdurous Mountains

结尾阅读片段

Scott Barry Kauffman, "Authenticity Under Fire,"Scientific American, 14 June 2019, https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/authenticity-under-fire/

Another thorny issue is measurement. Virtually all measures of authenticity involve self-report measures. However, people often do not know what they are really like or why they actually do what they do. So a test that asks people to report how authentic they are is unlikely to be a truly accurate measure of their authenticity.

Perhaps the thorniest issue of them all though is the entire notion of the real self. The humanistic psychotherapist Carl Rogers noted that many people who seek psychotherapy are plagued by the question: “Who am I, really?” While people spend so much time searching for their real self, the stark reality is that all of the aspects of your mind are part of you. It’s virtually impossible to think of any intentional behavior that does not reflect some genuine part of your psychological makeup, whether it’s your dispositions, attitudes, values or goals.

This creates a real problem for the scientific investigation of a concept such as authenticity. As Katrina Jongman-Sereno and Mark Leary conclude in their recent article “The Enigma of Being Yourself,”

“Given the complexity of people’s personalities, two seemingly incompatible actions might both be highly self-congruent. People are simply too complex, multifaceted and often conflicted for the concept of a unitary true self to be a useful standard for assessing authenticity, either in oneself or in others.”

So what is this true self that people are always talking about? Once you take a closer scientific examination, it seems that what people refer to as their “true self” really is just the aspects of themselves that make them feel the best about themselves. All around the world, people show an authenticity positivity bias: people include their most positive and moral qualities—such as kind, giving and honest—in their descriptions of their true self. People judge their positive behaviors as more authentic than their negative behaviors even when both behaviors are consistent with their personal characteristics and desires.

....

After all, I do believe there is within each of us best selves—aspects of who you are that are healthy, creative, and growth-oriented, and make you feel most connected to yourself and to others. I would argue that getting in touch with your best selves and intentionally actualizing your most creative, growth-oriented and potentialities is a much more worthy goal than spending your entire life trying to find your one true self. In my view, there is such a thing as healthy authenticity.