Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share 124: Can you use INTOXICATION as a defence for murder? | R. v Sullivan & Chan
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
124: Can you use INTOXICATION as a defence for murder? | R. v Sullivan & Chan
A few years ago Thomas Chan consumed magic mushrooms and went on to attack his father, arguing the defence of automatism in court: he wasn't responsible for his actions whilst under the influence. This, and the case of Sullivan, opened up a can of worms in Canadian law.
View all episodes
By Georgia Marie
4.5
153153 ratings
A few years ago Thomas Chan consumed magic mushrooms and went on to attack his father, arguing the defence of automatism in court: he wasn't responsible for his actions whilst under the influence. This, and the case of Sullivan, opened up a can of worms in Canadian law.
More shows like Mysteries and Histories
View all
Most Notorious! A True Crime History Podcast
2,795 Listeners
Unsolved Murders: True Crime Stories
13,773 Listeners
Appalachian Mysteria
2,650 Listeners
Crime Junkie
368,887 Listeners
Morbid
99,387 Listeners
Southern Mysteries Podcast
1,010 Listeners
So Supernatural
23,033 Listeners
Park Predators
17,738 Listeners
And Then They Were Gone
877 Listeners
Unsolved Mysteries
3,739 Listeners
Mind of a Monster: The Killer Nurse
1,669 Listeners
The Greatest True Crime Stories Ever Told
303 Listeners
Murder: True Crime Stories
773 Listeners
My Victorian Nightmare
1,369 Listeners
A Twist of History
1,530 Listeners