
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Four weeks ago in our Taylor/Jake episode, Mel boldly doubted if Taylor Swift and John Mayer were ever a thing, ever. Then, Taylor released “Should’ve, Could’ve, Would’ve” and the Swifities raged harder than they did after “Dear John.” Now, Mel EXTENSIVELY chronicles one iffy timeline between the brilliant songwriters, as a fan of both.
Should music be interpreted as nonfiction? Have Taylor Swift fans gone too far? Has John Mayer changed? What’s Taylor Lautner doing here? It’s a lot to unpack.
*****
This is a teaser for a bonus episode. You can listen to it in full on Patreon!
Significant Lovers is a historic romance and celebrity couples podcast. You can contact us at [email protected] and follow us on Instagram and TikTok @significantlovers.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for ‘fair use’ for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
By Kelly Anderson, Melissa Duffy, Kaitlyn Anderson4.5
112112 ratings
Four weeks ago in our Taylor/Jake episode, Mel boldly doubted if Taylor Swift and John Mayer were ever a thing, ever. Then, Taylor released “Should’ve, Could’ve, Would’ve” and the Swifities raged harder than they did after “Dear John.” Now, Mel EXTENSIVELY chronicles one iffy timeline between the brilliant songwriters, as a fan of both.
Should music be interpreted as nonfiction? Have Taylor Swift fans gone too far? Has John Mayer changed? What’s Taylor Lautner doing here? It’s a lot to unpack.
*****
This is a teaser for a bonus episode. You can listen to it in full on Patreon!
Significant Lovers is a historic romance and celebrity couples podcast. You can contact us at [email protected] and follow us on Instagram and TikTok @significantlovers.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for ‘fair use’ for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

10,928 Listeners

69,531 Listeners

165,131 Listeners

58,792 Listeners

6,485 Listeners

2,239 Listeners

2,524 Listeners

1,077 Listeners

3,380 Listeners

2,218 Listeners

2,109 Listeners

381 Listeners

18,041 Listeners

593 Listeners

359 Listeners