
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Four weeks ago in our Taylor/Jake episode, Mel boldly doubted if Taylor Swift and John Mayer were ever a thing, ever. Then, Taylor released “Should’ve, Could’ve, Would’ve” and the Swifities raged harder than they did after “Dear John.” Now, Mel EXTENSIVELY chronicles one iffy timeline between the brilliant songwriters, as a fan of both.
Should music be interpreted as nonfiction? Have Taylor Swift fans gone too far? Has John Mayer changed? What’s Taylor Lautner doing here? It’s a lot to unpack.
*****
This is a teaser for a bonus episode. You can listen to it in full on Patreon!
Significant Lovers is a historic romance and celebrity couples podcast. You can contact us at [email protected] and follow us on Instagram and TikTok @significantlovers.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for ‘fair use’ for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
By Kelly Anderson, Melissa Duffy, Kaitlyn Anderson4.5
112112 ratings
Four weeks ago in our Taylor/Jake episode, Mel boldly doubted if Taylor Swift and John Mayer were ever a thing, ever. Then, Taylor released “Should’ve, Could’ve, Would’ve” and the Swifities raged harder than they did after “Dear John.” Now, Mel EXTENSIVELY chronicles one iffy timeline between the brilliant songwriters, as a fan of both.
Should music be interpreted as nonfiction? Have Taylor Swift fans gone too far? Has John Mayer changed? What’s Taylor Lautner doing here? It’s a lot to unpack.
*****
This is a teaser for a bonus episode. You can listen to it in full on Patreon!
Significant Lovers is a historic romance and celebrity couples podcast. You can contact us at [email protected] and follow us on Instagram and TikTok @significantlovers.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for ‘fair use’ for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

10,925 Listeners

69,595 Listeners

165,356 Listeners

58,462 Listeners

6,487 Listeners

2,243 Listeners

2,519 Listeners

1,085 Listeners

3,411 Listeners

2,222 Listeners

2,103 Listeners

383 Listeners

18,280 Listeners

600 Listeners

358 Listeners