<p>In the case of Muldrow v. St Louis, the Supreme Court changed the standard required to show discrimination by employers. Brent, Nathan, and Steve chat about how this could change the way we investigate these kinds of cases and Brent has ideas about what companies could be keeping better track of when it comes to employee activity.

</p>

In the case of Muldrow v. St Louis, the Supreme Court changed the standard required to show discrimination by employers. Brent, Nathan, and Steve chat about how this could change the way we investigate these kinds of cases and Brent has ideas about what companies could be keeping better track of when it comes to employee activity.

2. Muldrow v. St Louis: No Significant Harm Required

Engaging, insightful, fun! Say hello to a fresh perspective on numbers with our hosts, Edgeworth Economics experts Dr. Steve Bronars, Dr. Nathan Woods, and Brent Butgereit, as they break down what’s happening in our current economic landscape and what they think about the figures that are important in our work and daily lives. Twentyish minutes of navigating the madness in the methods, every two weeks. We hope you walk away a bit better informed for your work, in your studies, or even at your next party.

Share 2. Muldrow v. St Louis: No Significant Harm Required

Sign up to save your podcasts

2. Muldrow v. St Louis: No Significant Harm Required

2. Muldrow v. St Louis: No Significant Harm Required