
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Do we burn them all, or can we redact the problematic parts? Or do we take the path that involves his confession, repentance and restoration?
Last week, we explored our own responses, as well as those of nine anonymous listeners/friends, to the sex scandals involving Christian authors and theologians. This began as a direct response to the recent revelation of Philip Yancey’s extramarital affair, but we also talked about parallel stories in the lives of Karl Barth, Ravi Zacharias, Bruxy Cavey and King David. The main question motivating our discussion was: what do we now do with the intellectual contributions they gave us? Do we burn them all? Can we sift through them and redact the problematic ones/parts?
To get more informed opinion on this, we brought in Dr. Sarah Shin (who wrote a scholarly article in a reputable journal specifically on this very question) as well as Dr. Karen Swallow Prior (a highly sought out thinker and speaker in the Evangelical community who has also written complementary pieces on this problem).
We first introduced our audience to Dr. Shin’s paper, which focused specifically on Karl Barth and John Howard Yoder, both of whom had tremendous influence on the development of Christian theology in the early 20th century, despite having scandalously breached traditional Christian sexual ethics. This paper became a platform on which to discuss our response to the sexual indiscretions of other Christian leaders like Philip Yancey, Ravi Zacharias, or King David, as well as the Christian community’s response to parallel problems such as racial abuse. Her paper highlighted several points:
We dug deeper into the “type 2” problem/approach by exploring a variety of systemic issues that may be at play here:
We also talked briefly about the paths to restitution and restoration, and made comparisons between King David, Karl Barth, Ravi Zacharias, and Philip Yancey with respect to how they may or may not have acknowledged the breach, apologized, offered restitution, and/or been restored.
As always, tell us what you think!
You can find more about our guests at Dr. Sarah Shin’s Instagram page and Dr. Karen Swallow Prior’s web-page.
If you enjoyed this episode, you might also be interested in our mini-series asking: Why is Christianity so hung up about sex?
Episode image by Andrew. Thanks Andrew!
To help grow this podcast, please like, share and post a rating/review at your favorite podcast catcher.
Subscribe here to get updates each time a new episode is posted...
Join our private discussion group at Facebook and our YouTube channel.
Back to Recovering Evangelicals home-page and the podcast archive
By Luke Jeffrey Janssen4.8
5454 ratings
Do we burn them all, or can we redact the problematic parts? Or do we take the path that involves his confession, repentance and restoration?
Last week, we explored our own responses, as well as those of nine anonymous listeners/friends, to the sex scandals involving Christian authors and theologians. This began as a direct response to the recent revelation of Philip Yancey’s extramarital affair, but we also talked about parallel stories in the lives of Karl Barth, Ravi Zacharias, Bruxy Cavey and King David. The main question motivating our discussion was: what do we now do with the intellectual contributions they gave us? Do we burn them all? Can we sift through them and redact the problematic ones/parts?
To get more informed opinion on this, we brought in Dr. Sarah Shin (who wrote a scholarly article in a reputable journal specifically on this very question) as well as Dr. Karen Swallow Prior (a highly sought out thinker and speaker in the Evangelical community who has also written complementary pieces on this problem).
We first introduced our audience to Dr. Shin’s paper, which focused specifically on Karl Barth and John Howard Yoder, both of whom had tremendous influence on the development of Christian theology in the early 20th century, despite having scandalously breached traditional Christian sexual ethics. This paper became a platform on which to discuss our response to the sexual indiscretions of other Christian leaders like Philip Yancey, Ravi Zacharias, or King David, as well as the Christian community’s response to parallel problems such as racial abuse. Her paper highlighted several points:
We dug deeper into the “type 2” problem/approach by exploring a variety of systemic issues that may be at play here:
We also talked briefly about the paths to restitution and restoration, and made comparisons between King David, Karl Barth, Ravi Zacharias, and Philip Yancey with respect to how they may or may not have acknowledged the breach, apologized, offered restitution, and/or been restored.
As always, tell us what you think!
You can find more about our guests at Dr. Sarah Shin’s Instagram page and Dr. Karen Swallow Prior’s web-page.
If you enjoyed this episode, you might also be interested in our mini-series asking: Why is Christianity so hung up about sex?
Episode image by Andrew. Thanks Andrew!
To help grow this podcast, please like, share and post a rating/review at your favorite podcast catcher.
Subscribe here to get updates each time a new episode is posted...
Join our private discussion group at Facebook and our YouTube channel.
Back to Recovering Evangelicals home-page and the podcast archive