Inconsistent behavior in organizations isn't a discipline problem—it's a design problem. When employees create workarounds, bypass official processes, or behave "non-compliantly," they're often responding rationally to systems that make the wrong path easier than the right one.

In this foundational episode of Season 2, Senior UX Researcher Daniel explores why consistency emerges from system design, not willpower. Drawing from real enterprise systems mapping work, he breaks down a case where business teams consistently bypassed internal IT experiences—not due to lack of training, but because the system structure made external vendors the only viable path to meet deadlines.

You'll discover:

• The "Replace the People" test: A diagnostic framework to identify true system problems
• Three critical questions to ask when analyzing inconsistent organizational behavior
• Why layered governance can accidentally create shadow IT and security blind spots
• How to shift accountability from frontline teams to the designers and leaders who create system conditions

Perfect for service designers, UX researchers, organizational designers, and anyone responsible for employee experience in complex systems.

Season 2, Episode 1: Foundation Arc