
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Here are six reasons why a Constitutional Convention is a terrible idea.
The last time we had a convention to amend our constitution was the Philadelphia Convention of 1787. Delegates from 12 of the 13 states gathered for the express purpose of revising the existing constitution; the Articles of Confederation. Many of the delegates admitted they did not follow the authority of their state commissions. The delegates concluded they were accountable to the people not the state legislatures, thereby justifying disobeying their commissions and limitations. In light of this, there is no guarantee that history will not repeat itself at a so-called “convention of the states” and why supposed “faithful delegate bills” are meaningless and misleading.
Here’s a Tweet from constitutionalist Congressman Thomas Massie to put this into perspective:
I think an Article V Convention is a bad idea, and could be disastrous for our country.
How many state legislatures stood up to the illegal and unconstitutional acts of their governors during COVID?
Show me a single state where Constitutionalists comprise a majority of the state legislature.
At this point in history, an Article V Convention of the States would be a disaster.
Why give RINOs and the left a seat at the table to discuss ways to alter our Constitution and republican form of government?
We may not know what they come up with until it is done. And with a nation as deeply divided as ours, is there really anything we could agree on that would actually limit the powers of Congress better than what the Founders gave us in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution? A constitution is only as good as it’s enforcement.
Educate yourself on how to talk to your state legislator so we can preserve and save our Constitution from revision.
Learn more about Article V and the amendment process by visiting JBS.org.
By The John Birch Society4.4
2727 ratings
Here are six reasons why a Constitutional Convention is a terrible idea.
The last time we had a convention to amend our constitution was the Philadelphia Convention of 1787. Delegates from 12 of the 13 states gathered for the express purpose of revising the existing constitution; the Articles of Confederation. Many of the delegates admitted they did not follow the authority of their state commissions. The delegates concluded they were accountable to the people not the state legislatures, thereby justifying disobeying their commissions and limitations. In light of this, there is no guarantee that history will not repeat itself at a so-called “convention of the states” and why supposed “faithful delegate bills” are meaningless and misleading.
Here’s a Tweet from constitutionalist Congressman Thomas Massie to put this into perspective:
I think an Article V Convention is a bad idea, and could be disastrous for our country.
How many state legislatures stood up to the illegal and unconstitutional acts of their governors during COVID?
Show me a single state where Constitutionalists comprise a majority of the state legislature.
At this point in history, an Article V Convention of the States would be a disaster.
Why give RINOs and the left a seat at the table to discuss ways to alter our Constitution and republican form of government?
We may not know what they come up with until it is done. And with a nation as deeply divided as ours, is there really anything we could agree on that would actually limit the powers of Congress better than what the Founders gave us in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution? A constitution is only as good as it’s enforcement.
Educate yourself on how to talk to your state legislator so we can preserve and save our Constitution from revision.
Learn more about Article V and the amendment process by visiting JBS.org.

62,628 Listeners

188 Listeners

3 Listeners

21 Listeners

9 Listeners