On today’s episode Jake reviews the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case of <a href= "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-899_97be.pdf">Smith v. Arizona</a>. This 9-0 decision provides clarity on the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause violations that occur when the state tries to substitute a lab analyst at trial who did not herself test the substances or blood at the lab. Don’t miss the big implications this opinion has on your blood draw DWI case!

On today’s episode Jake reviews the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case of Smith v. Arizona. This 9-0 decision provides clarity on the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause violations that occur when the state tries to substitute a lab analyst at trial who did not herself test the substances or blood at the lab. Don’t miss the big implications this opinion has on your blood draw DWI case!

On today’s episode Jake reviews the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case of <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-899_97be.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Smith v. Arizona</a>. This 9-0 decision provides clarity on the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause violations that occur when the state tries to substitute a lab analyst at trial who did not herself test the substances or blood at the lab. Don’t miss the big implications this opinion has on your blood draw DWI case! &nbsp;

222. Smith v. Arizona

A show for criminal defense lawyers and law firm owners. We discuss the strategy and tactics of handling DWI / DUI cases and the marketing practices that can revolutionize your law practice. If you are ready to take your DWI practice to the next level in both the courtroom and the marketplace, this show is for you.

Share 222. Smith v. Arizona

Sign up to save your podcasts

222. Smith v. Arizona

222. Smith v. Arizona