Those familiar with my youtube and rumble channels (and even going back to The Fiend beginning in 2010) will know my interest in David Icke's material. Here I attempt to critique some of the problems I have with David Icke's work in detail. The conspiracy researcher (particularly of the boomer and great generations) will have very little knowledge of the Western nationalist movements that sprung up in the West between Ron Paul's bid for leadership and Trump's presidential campaign... or if he/she does they will rarely go into the weeds on them, and definitely NOT risk discussions of race and the Jewish Question in any direct way. Herein lies the problem. For some like myself who wish to straddle the conspiracy sphere of the early 21st century and the newer nationalist movements one will be accused of one thing or another along the way. Still, the older conspiracists fail, in my view, to directly promote ethnostatism directly, and that this constitutes the unravelling of the cultural and ethnic underpinnings of the West in general.

And while, in my view, Icke has turned out to be correct in being sceptical of Trump, he has also always shirked questions of race and direct political solutions and overly simplified revisionist studies of the 2nd World War lest he be accused of racism, Nazism etc. One understands that it will always simply be the cry of the metaphysically unitarian 'non-consent' he offers as solution, and that this is not enough to address with nuance all that is occurring in the West currently.