I needed a chance to get through the information about who funded the 'Declaration ' anthology from my earlier podcasts; Howard Samuel. Also, the comments to my recent 'Your Government Wants You Dead' article prompted some other content. Questions regarding leadership will ostensibly have to wait until a full podcast can be devoted to it.

Analysis of a presentation given by Daljit Nagra in 2017 on the topic of his first collection; 'Look We Have Coming to Dover'. Given that my last podcast on Nagra's poetry was from this first book I thought to provide commentary on the presentation, to further give context to my initial comments on the poem 'Digging'.

Digging into my past regarding memories of travelling amongst different people from different places, and talking about how multiculturalism has screwed up England and the world in general. God loathe neo-liberalism etc...

In this podcast I investigate an early poem by the Faber poet Daljit Nagra, compare it with the poem by Seamus Heaney it was inspired by,, and ruminate on issues of multiculturalism in 21st Century poetry.

Tying up some loose ends from previous podcasts, but also this is a podcast on coming to terms with what mid-century literature in Britain was, in all its ragged subversions. Doris Lessing, Kenneth Tynan, John Osborne, Kingsley Amis, Lindsay Anderson, Bill Hopkins, Wilson himself. I will follow this up with some more research on the background to the 'Declaration' anthology

Commentary on my last year of watching Civic Nationalism finally implode as a movement regarding the immigration problem. This recording will serve as a summary of my year watching content from Nick Fuentes, Academic Agent, Candace Owens, The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters and Steve Laws' 'Remigration Now' debate. The concerns? How indigenous nationalism gets co-opted into mainstream debate on immigration, and how Laws is avoiding it with genuine ethno-nationalist talking points.

In which I follow up on some threads from the previous podcast. I focus on Bill Hopkins' mention of 'The Crusade for World Government', my research possibly connecting it to the Fabians and The London School of Economics, as well as looking at other writers from the 'Declaration' anthology of 1957, most notably Colin Wilson's then-credo; 'Beyond the Outsider'.

Reading of Bill Hopkins' rare article from 1957, in which he expounds his ideas regarding the inherent power of Western literature in contrast to the dearth of valuable literary content at mid-century. His critique involved an almost total dismissal of all modern literature of the twentieth century (as my own feelings concur with that theme as the twentieth century moves into the twenty first century). I will continue my thoughts on Bill Hopkins in a future podcast on his novel 'The Divine and the Decay'.and relate the content of the novel back to this material. You can find 'The Divine and the Decay'/'The Leap' at archive.org

A backward glance at the youtube video entitled Calasso's Rig Veda with a very fresh conspiratorial take on Julian Jaynes' theory re; Homer's 'Iliad'. This leads on to some further speculation about the evolution of language, and revised judgemants on the works of D.H. Lawrence and James Joyce through Wyndham Lewis' "Hitler".

Those familiar with my youtube and rumble channels (and even going back to The Fiend beginning in 2010) will know my interest in David Icke's material. Here I attempt to critique some of the problems I have with David Icke's work in detail. The conspiracy researcher (particularly of the boomer and great generations) will have very little knowledge of the Western nationalist movements that sprung up in the West between Ron Paul's bid for leadership and Trump's presidential campaign... or if he/she does they will rarely go into the weeds on them, and definitely NOT risk discussions of race and the Jewish Question in any direct way. Herein lies the problem. For some like myself who wish to straddle the conspiracy sphere of the early 21st century and the newer nationalist movements one will be accused of one thing or another along the way. Still, the older conspiracists fail, in my view, to directly promote ethnostatism directly, and that this constitutes the unravelling of the cultural and ethnic underpinnings of the West in general.

And while, in my view, Icke has turned out to be correct in being sceptical of Trump, he has also always shirked questions of race and direct political solutions and overly simplified revisionist studies of the 2nd World War lest he be accused of racism, Nazism etc. One understands that it will always simply be the cry of the metaphysically unitarian 'non-consent' he offers as solution, and that this is not enough to address with nuance all that is occurring in the West currently.